Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Oregon Coast

  1. #1
    BPN Member Douglas Bolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beltsville, MD USA
    Posts
    567
    Threads
    114
    Thank You Posts

    Default Oregon Coast

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 5DM2, 24-105@32, ISO 160, f22, 1.3s
    PP: SoftLight blend (20%), Nik Color Efex (detail extracthon 10%, contrast slight boost, sat slight boost). Nik sharpened.
    Douglas Bolt
    DougBoltPhotography.com

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Douglas - beautiful colors and I like the comp with the 3 large rocks. I do wonder if you had gone slightly wider if you could have avoided cutting the rock on the lhs and the smaller rocks on the rhs. A couple of nits - there's a halo around the rocks, fairly pronounced on the lhs of the closest rock and on the right edge of the middle two. There's some noise or other PP issue in parts of the sky. It's most noticeable in the lighter area above the tree on the closest rock and in the purple/blue immediately above the third rock from the left.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice comp and colors but something went wrong in PP maybe,
    A lot of noise, iso160 w/5DM2 should not look like this.
    Dan Kearl

  4. #4
    BPN Member Douglas Bolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beltsville, MD USA
    Posts
    567
    Threads
    114
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Reprocessed using PK Sharpening and less boost on the colors. It is full frame, so couldn't include more on the sides. Exposure in Bridge was -.22. I think this ver is cleaner, but still not very smooth. More suggestions welcomed.
    Douglas Bolt
    DougBoltPhotography.com

  5. #5
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Doug, repost looks much better. With scenes as nice as this, maybe better to just minimize PP, crop for comp,
    and call it good.
    Dan Kearl

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mate, lookin' better; however, there is a strong white halo around the large rock and to a lesser extent around the others. I think you need to reduce the opacity of your sharpening.

    Definitely needs a bit of CW.

    I would also consider a bit of a burn in the foreground as given where the shadows on the rocks are falling, the foreground is very bright.
    Cheers, Jay

    My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com

    "Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NE Mississippi
    Posts
    4,700
    Threads
    636
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The colors are beautiful! Agree with comments above.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern WI
    Posts
    39
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The repost is mostly a huge improvement, esp. the noise reduction in the sky. However, you've lost detail in the rocks, as they are now considerably darker.

  9. #9
    Angelika Schauf
    Guest

    Default

    Excellent light, details and bg.

  10. #10
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Douglas, lovely colors in the sky and I prefer the pane #1. I find the extra foreground in the repost to be a bit of a distraction. Is this low-tide? I wonder what it might look like at high-tide?

  11. #11
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Douglas,

    Jay and Andrew summed up my thoughts well.

  12. #12
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Awesome colours and strong base comp. You received some good input already. I would have loved to see a proper exposure-blend here to maximise the dynamic range and get good detail/exposure for every area...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    562
    Threads
    51
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great scene with some great comments :)

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Big Island of Hawaii
    Posts
    26
    Threads
    3
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes, great potential here! Just a note on Nik sharpening. You can reduce/remove the global sharp adjustment and then use control points to add sharpen to just the areas you want, the
    rocks, foreground etc, and leave the sky unsharpened. Sharpening the sky will greatly increase noise. The repost is moving in the right direction.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics