Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Giant Amazon Water Lily

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,361
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default Giant Amazon Water Lily

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Shot early yesterday morning at the Missouri Botanical Gardens, about 7:10 am under a very cloudy sky. 320mm, f/32@1/8. Processed the RAW file in LR; cropped some from the top, boosted clarity and vibrance a bit. Brought the image into PS, touched up some specular highlights from some debris bits on the water, did a little work with Viveza for selective toning. The plants themselves are amazing; the lily pads can grow to be several feet across and can support the weight of a child. The blooms are very large, and both the unopened blooms and the underside of the pads are densely covered with large thorns, creating a contrast between a simple beauty and a strong survival sense. I may process this further and try it OOB as well...looking forward to your thoughts.

  2. #2
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John. This is a pretty amazing plant - those thorns are very impressive! Very nice sharpness for f/32 @ 1/8. I like the soft light and the perfect reflections as well as the bit of color and detail in the water. I'm also liking the comp. I'm not as fond of the straight stem(?) just above the pad and the shorter one just to the left of the pad. In my view, these elements are detracting from a very strong image and you might consider removing them. Otherwise, this is very well done.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    hi John, Amazing how we came up with completely different things last Sat. Another piece of stellar post processing. I do agree with Steve on evicting the two stems. I think it presents a different view. Give it a try and see if it works for you......

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    John...I don't mind the stems they lend some depth to the image and w/o them the bud would just seem to float in blackness.....just my 2cents! Beautiful image as usual!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,361
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you for the comments and suggestions. I evicted the two stems...still debating on whether or not to keep the image with them or without them. I also rotated 2.5 degrees CW...see what you think. Thanks again!

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    looks good to me................nice RP.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Polokwane South Africa
    Posts
    274
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John, What a plant!... and beautifully presented... firstly your IQ at f32and f1.8 is superb... love the dark water which brings out that beautiful softs colours and detail... do agree with the guys about the stems... so I do prefer the second post... but would remove the piece on the RHS flower as it draws my eye to the right all the time... otherwise good comp and hope to see one with a flower in bloom... TFS and VWD!

  8. #8
    Forum Participant christopher galeski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ENGLAND LANCASHIRE
    Posts
    5,106
    Threads
    360
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    nice one John,like the repost,like the black water,the bud at the back,looks like it is sticking its tonge outthanks for showing.

  9. #9
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    John - I really like the repost. The comp is a lot cleaner and I like the rotation too.

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern, CA
    Posts
    107
    Threads
    25
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love the repost. Great PP on this image.

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,361
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you for the comments and suggestions...deeply appreciated!

  12. #12
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey John,
    Repost works for me and nice job following the suggestions!

  13. #13
    Susan Candelario
    Guest

    Default

    Hi John,
    The repost w/o the stems if my favorite. I see some repetition from the clone work. Easy to fix. Other than that I think the exp. detail & comp are great and make it a very strong image for me. Very nice, John!

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,361
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you Susan...I'm somewhat ashamed that I didn't catch that myself...but I went back in and took a good look and darned if they weren't there! Thank you for catching that...and corrected, I hope!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics