Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Common Blue

  1. #1
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,342
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default Common Blue

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Camera Model Canon EOS 7D
    Firmware Firmware Version 1.2.1
    Tripod
    Shooting Mode Aperture-Priority AE
    Tv( Shutter Speed ) 1/160
    Av( Aperture Value ) 11.0
    Metering Mode Evaluative Metering
    Exposure Compensation 0
    ISO Speed 400
    Lens EF180mm f/3.5L Macro USM
    Flash On
    Flash Type External E-TTL
    E-TTL II flash metering Evaluative flash metering
    Flash Exposure Compensation -1 2/3
    Shutter curtain sync 1st-curtain sync
    White Balance Mode Auto
    AF Mode AI Servo AF
    AF area select mode Spot AF

    I will be interested to see if you like the colours and processing, previously my colour space has been sRGB and I had the initial setting in Adobe RAW for Sharpen for Screen, now I have colour space Adobe and no initial sharpening. Previously I had been using 16 bit processing with sRGB which I understand was pretty much a waste of time. This is 8 bit Adobe and auto converted to sRGB by CS4 and I just cannot see any difference at all. I am now going to do a 16 bit Adobe to see if I can convince myself I can see a difference visually as opposed to checking the histogram which obviously can show a difference.
    All comments welcome.
    Last edited by Jonathan Ashton; 08-15-2010 at 03:02 PM.

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,342
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Her is the same image processed similarly except that it is at 16 bit as opposed to 8 bit - can you see a difference?

  3. #3
    BPN Member Paul Lagasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bells Corners, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,316
    Threads
    642
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jonathan, I downloaded both images, did a side by side comparison in CS4. Got my wife and daughter to have a look...couldn't see a difference, although, I like you could almost convince my self there was.
    Nice capture and colors, sharp and decent background ....well done

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    I can't see a difference either. Fantastic sharp details and lovely composition. The BG colors are complimentary and nice. I might sharpen the tips of the antennae just a tiny bit. Excellent!!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Before I read Paul and Denise's posts I would have said the second was a tad lighter, but as Paul mentioned, perhaps I was looking too hard.

    I really like the composition and position of bf on the grass.

    Lovely photo either way.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    We're going to have to start calling these Jonathan Blues. :D

    Another beauty, Jon! There is noticeable fringing on the 8 bit when compared to the 16 bit but the colors look the same.

  7. #7
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,342
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Childs View Post
    We're going to have to start calling these Jonathan Blues. :D

    Another beauty, Jon! There is noticeable fringing on the 8 bit when compared to the 16 bit but the colors look the same.
    Thanks for the observation Ken, is the fringing on the tip of the antennae - because I did an extra round of sharpening on the tips using a quick mas on the final image - otherwise the processing was the same. - Also were you looking at actual image size e.g. pressing F11 or were you "looking harder?"

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Ashton View Post
    Thanks for the observation Ken, is the fringing on the tip of the antennae - because I did an extra round of sharpening on the tips using a quick mas on the final image - otherwise the processing was the same. - Also were you looking at actual image size e.g. pressing F11 or were you "looking harder?"
    I was looking at actual sized images. It's most obvious on the antennae and the edges of the grass. I put both images in the same folder and opened the first with the Windows photo viewer and then switched back and forth between images by using the right and left arrows keys. When comparing different edits of the same image or similar images, this works best for me.

  9. #9
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Jonathan,
    Love the comp and colors.....i thought second one was brighter too....but looking closer....probably no. Nice catch by Ken.......but doesn't detract from this one.....Very well Done!

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely! Beautiful details, composition, colors and BG.

  11. #11
    Art Kornienko
    Guest

    Default

    BG and lighting are stunning a bit more room on the right would be my peference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics