Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Shell

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default Shell

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 30D
    Sigma 100-300mm f/4 @ 208mm
    1/500sec f/5.6 ISO 400

  2. #2
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Ian,
    Given the lens you used I do wish you had gone out the last 100mm to focus more on the shell. You could have kept the same/similar comp yet eliminated some of the distracting BG elements.......which brings me to an interesting point....most times in macro....if I have the time with my subject....flowers, mushrooms, shells, etc......things that aren't going anywhere....I spend more time policing/cleaning up the area than I do actually taking the image. I'm not saying make it perfect....but those couple of black strands around the shell....gone! Less PP'ing work I have to do. As presented, I like the angle you have on the shell but I would crop all around.....bottom to where the sand gets sharp....proportional off the R....top where it eliminates all the BG stuff/specs and proportionally off the left.....all could have been done in camera with the extra 100mm! Then just clean up the top 2 black strands at the least......it will then be stronger IMO.

  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Roman said what I was thinking - tighter crop and cleaner BG. I do like the texture of the sand against the texture of the shell and don't mind the angle but I think even lower to the ground would make the viewer 'connect' more with the shell IMO.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julie Kenward View Post
    Roman said what I was thinking - tighter crop and cleaner BG. I do like the texture of the sand against the texture of the shell and don't mind the angle but I think even lower to the ground would make the viewer 'connect' more with the shell IMO.
    I was thinking just the opposite. I'd like to see this shot from straight above, possibly from farther away, with a smaller aperture so the shell and all the textures in the sand would be in focus.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, folks. Actually, I did have a couple with the shell up-close, but I preferred the shell on the BG of sand-texture. I agree, I should have cleaned up the little bits of seaweed and gotten rid of the OOF FG. You make a good point, Roman, about cleaning up before to avoid it later (a lesson I am constantly teaching my kids in other contexts ;)).

  6. #6
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Cassell View Post
    ......You make a good point, Roman, about cleaning up before to avoid it later (a lesson I am constantly teaching my kids in other contexts ;)).
    See.....I have 2 teenage sons!!!.....so I am all too familiar with those lessons!

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    LOL I have twin 13 year olds!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics