Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Good idea or Bad idea

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Spring Hill, Florida
    Posts
    662
    Threads
    160
    Thank You Posts

    Default Good idea or Bad idea

    Is it a good idea or a bad idea to do the following in Camera Raw. I have always avoided doing the processes in Raw feeling that I will address these steps in the processing anyway and don't know of any advantage to do these in Raw.

    1) Cropping and straightening

    2) Sharpening

    3) Noise reduction

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    993
    Threads
    166
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    When I have the RAW file in front of me to post process, I do one global sharpening step. Cropping and straightening and noise reduction is after I have Save As, my RAW, to 16-bit tiff.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Frye View Post
    Is it a good idea or a bad idea to do the following in Camera Raw. I have always avoided doing the processes in Raw feeling that I will address these steps in the processing anyway and don't know of any advantage to do these in Raw.

    1) Cropping and straightening
    Depends on how you feel about starting over from raw if your crop is wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Frye View Post
    2) Sharpening
    I think some sharpening in RAW processing is a good idea. Some folks disagree. It is not all the sharpening you will do... sharpen in raw processing, post-process, sharpen in post-processing (sharpening is last step for target output).

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Frye View Post
    3) Noise reduction
    I don't think noise reduction in RAW processing is a good idea because often you only want to do noise reduction on a portion of an image.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    386
    Threads
    27
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Scott
    Each new version of ACR has allowed more and more processing of your image - so why not use it if you intend to create a new master file.
    Fully agree with Michael's comments but would add:
    -if you open as a smart object, then very easy to go back and make changes/corrections
    ACR processing becomes even more useful if you can batch process "similar" files

  5. #5
    Michael Pancier
    Guest

    Default

    I try not to crop when downloading raw files. I prefer to use Lightroom and I'll crop, straighten, etc. and then save as a tif in case I change my mind later.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,949
    Threads
    254
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Scott,

    If your raw output is a 16-bit tif, then I would leave your 3 steps to post processing. If 8-bit output, I would do as much as I could in the raw converter. What does need to be done in the raw converter:

    chromatic aberration correction.

    black point set not to clip.

    white point set not to clip

    highlight recovery if needed.

    Roger

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics