Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Family Tree

  1. #1
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default Family Tree

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    20D 100-400L IS @ ISO400 F/8 1/70 AVERAGE HANDHELD

    Rarely do I take landscape, in fact this is my only one. The dusk was just coming on and the curve and twist of the wind blow trees with the hundreds of little branches for detail just struck me in a relaxing way.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant John Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia - New South Wales
    Posts
    2,065
    Threads
    241
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A colourful & interesting sky seen between the multiple branches here Bill.
    A lot of halo formations around the the branches, possibly from too much USM or other prcessing techniques.

  3. #3
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Good idea Bill and it works well. The tangle of branches against the sunset is a hard one to make sense out of. I would have imcluded a bit more room onthe left and right to include the trunks of the trees.

    Go to the bottom of this thread for Artie's post on making small JPGs.
    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...read.php?t=839

  4. #4
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    Thank you gentleman, I will rework it from scratch and see what happens. It was one of the first images captured and PSed when I went digital. I do have the trunks in the original capture and my PS skills heve greatly improved since then.Now that I look at it, I'm wondering if a verticle would work. I'll be back.
    Last edited by Bill McCrystyn; 02-24-2008 at 10:24 AM.

  5. #5
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default Rework Verticle

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Ok, a couple differant looks. Hope this is better.Here is a verticle and horizontal rework below.

  6. #6
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default Horizontal Rework

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I know so much of this is all subjective but I want to know which version you prefer and why. A continuing critique is appreciated.

  7. #7
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Bill,

    Got your PM. Thanks and glad to come take another look.

    The Horizontal Version: The JPG quality has improved greatly. I like how you added a bit more room on the left and right as I am no longer wondering about the branches coming in from the sides.

    The Vertical Version: THIS IS GREAT. The horizontal version is a bit confusing though I liked the diagonals in it. In the vertical you went right for that part of the image. The diagonals are very strong and continue right from the bottom to the top. Most excellent and well seen possibility. I love it.

  8. #8
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks so much. We are in agreement. I think I have a new print rolling off the old R-1800. :)

  9. #9
    Forum Participant John Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia - New South Wales
    Posts
    2,065
    Threads
    241
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill McCrystyn View Post
    I know so much of this is all subjective but I want to know which version you prefer and why. A continuing critique is appreciated.
    Thanks Bill for your message regarding repost.
    Yes I agree with Robert, the vertical format showing the digaonal brances here works very well, and a big improvement on the original post - Top job !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics