Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Shadow/Highlights and Noise

  1. #1
    Jeff Nadler
    Guest

    Default Shadow/Highlights and Noise

    The S/H tool has always had a split opinion-some find it very helpful and others prefer to avoid it and use their more advanced abilities in curves, layer masks, etc.

    When I want a quick fix for an underexposed subject, ESPECIALLY the underside of wings, I try the S/H tool either on the entire image or just selecting the area underexposed.

    When used, the introduction of digital noise in the brightened area is often unacceptable to me. Removing the noise as a secondary step then elminates too much detail.

    Any comments welcome.

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    This is a very interesting topic, Jeff!

    I try to apply curves in ACR on the RAW file and only very little later on in PS. This way I have only minor problems with introducing noise. I'm wondering how much this problem differs depending on camera type. 1D3 files seem much less prone to noise than let's say XTi files.

  3. #3
    Jeff Nadler
    Guest

    Default

    While my 40D overall noise levels is an improvement over prior models, the noise level when using the S/H tool in PSCS2 does not seem to vary.

  4. #4
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Nadler View Post
    While my 40D overall noise levels is an improvement over prior models, the noise level when using the S/H tool in PSCS2 does not seem to vary.
    Maybe you could get the trial version of CS3 and experiment with ACR 4.3 It really makes a big difference, not just curves and highlight recovery.

  5. #5
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Jeff,

    Your comments on SH are right on. SH is very quick to apply but in many cases the side effects are counter productive. For the best results without SH side effects I find that blending 2 converted images with a layer mask. It looks better but takes a lot more time.

    Robert

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi jeff I have been trying to get the exposure right if possible I know in full sun sometimes you have to underexpose to save the highlights Situations that I know will not give me the exposure I want have been passing up !! Haven't tried any with the new D3 and its clean ISO Might make a difference !!!

  7. #7
    Jeff Nadler
    Guest

    Default

    Yes, recently at Viera in bright sun, the whites on the eagle, hooded merganser, and wading birds are a challenge. I guess I love overcast days.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,322
    Threads
    3,980
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    For that particular tool I find that toning down highlights works much better than brightening shadows. I try to avoid it for use on shadows.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics