Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Perito Moreno Glacier

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default Perito Moreno Glacier

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken in January of this year in Argentina.
    I originally posted it in ETL, but have reworked it after reading the thread here on colour balancing, which I tried. Also did a white point and black point in curves.
    I tried to bring out the textures and colours in the ice, but I don't know if it works as a stand alone image. The glacier is about 200 feet high, above the water.
    Taken from a boat.
    20D
    ISO 400
    17-55 @55
    HH
    cropped a little from top and bottom
    0EV
    Polarizer
    Comments would be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Jackie,
    I think it does stand on it's own. The textures of the ice were brought out very well and the curves in it make very nice pleasing lines. I may add a bit of the base water back in.........but it may add more distracting bergs...which you could clone out if you so choose.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jackie,
    I also think it works very well. I like the horizontal bands of color, each with a different texture, contrasting with the mostly vertical patterns in the upper part of the ice. I think I agree with Roman that adding back just a little more of the green water would add to the overall balance. But that's your call.
    Last edited by Robert Amoruso; 11-22-2008 at 06:17 PM. Reason: Not edited. Accidentally opened it as edit.

  4. #4
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Jackie,

    I think this works well and you did great bringing out the details in the berg. Agree that more water would strengthen the image. i did notice a pronounced dark halo along the berg and sky - probably an artifact from the processing. If it due to sharpening, do a selection on the sky, invert it, refine edges by contracting the selection so the edge of the berg is not sharpened, feather it 1/2 the amount of the contraction and then sharpen the berg.
    Last edited by Robert Amoruso; 11-22-2008 at 06:18 PM.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Robert, I was wondering about the edge, I used PK superfine edge sharpener for 800 pixels, thought it produced a line will have to go back and adjust. Thank you all for taking the time to critique!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics