Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Yellow and black longhorn beetle

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    66
    Threads
    30
    Thank You Posts

    Default Yellow and black longhorn beetle


    Canon 40D, Tokina 100mm f/2.8 @ f/13, 1/13, Berlebeach mini tripod, MLU, slight crop.

  2. #2
    Ed Vatza
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Karl,

    The beetle is cool. With a straight head on image it is very difficult to get the whole beetle in focus even, I see, at f/13. But the head and antennae look sharp. I kinda wish that you were just a little higher above the beetle to give a little better look at the back and markings. The background looks terrific but the flowers look a little hot on my screen. I look forward to seeing more.

  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    I agree with Ed. The beetle is nicely in focus but the flowers are really too hot. You might want to try calming those down!

  4. #4
    Mike Moats
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Karl, very nice image a nice framing of the critter. I agree with others on the hot flower.

  5. #5
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Karl

    Cool subject and great work, the focus is right on, you didnt clip any important bits and you were able to get 100% of the antenna in the frame.

    Good highlight control, whites dont look at all hot on my computer, they all look a bluish light gray. Guess the poster and I are the only PC users here.

    If the whites look hot on your computer, take a look down at the bottom of each page on BPN, I can see each square clearly, if you cannot see the first and last boxes clearly you need to calibrate your monitor or change your viewing angle.

    Robert

  6. #6
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here is a capture so we can see the tones on a calibration scale and what I am referring to in my last post. The whites in the image dont look hot or blown at all.

    I would be interested to see how many of the previous posters use a mac or a calibrated monitor.

    Robert

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    66
    Threads
    30
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert O'Toole View Post
    Here is a capture so we can see the tones on a calibration scale and what I am referring to in my last post. The whites in the image dont look hot or blown at all.
    Thanks for coming to the rescue of my monitor calibration :-) as I could not explain to myself what the other posters were complaining about. The histogram looked a smidge hot but no significant clipping and not as much as to ruin the shot to my eyes... Oh by the way I am using GIMP on Linux, no Windows involved :-)
    regards
    Karl Günter
    Last edited by Karl Günter Wünsch; 07-21-2008 at 01:36 PM.

  8. #8
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karl Günter Wünsch View Post
    Thanks for coming to the rescue of my monitor calibration :-) as I could not explain to myself what the other posters were complaining about. The histogram looked a smidge hot but no significant clipping and not as much as to ruin the shot to my eyes... Oh by the way I am using GIMP on Linux, no Windows involed :-)
    regards
    Karl Günter

    Glad to help, Dont mention it, that is what I am here for :-)

    This happens quite a bit in this world of non calibrated monitors and ICC ignorant programs. I posted an image of a grizzly bear laying in wildflowers last week and almost everyone complained that the grass was too green. I was the only one there and the image looks accurate to me but what can you do in that case?

    Robert

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    66
    Threads
    30
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert O'Toole View Post
    Glad to help, Dont mention it, that is what I am here for :-)

    This happens quite a bit in this world of non calibrated monitors and ICC ignorant programs. I posted an image of a grizzly bear laying in wildflowers last week and almost everyone complained that the grass was too green. I was the only one there and the image looks accurate to me but what can you do in that case?
    Nothing, the problem is that everyone has his own expectations on what a colour should look like. For me the main problem often is green as I take many of my pictures on dry chalk meadows on which foliage almost always has an olive tinge - which disagrees with the experiences people in other parts of the world (or even in Germany) have... I thus find myself often tempted to avoid the inevitable discussion by ofsetting my green towards the "common sense" colour tone :-(
    regards
    Karl Günter

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Racine, Wisconsin
    Posts
    97
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Karl,

    Like Robert, I am a PC user with a calibrated monitor and the flowers are not hot at all on my monitor and in fact are just as Robert described. It is a terrific image ( I am partial to long horn beetles) especially since both antennae are positioned so nicely which is not alway easy to capture. The background is perfect and you are at 'eye level' with the insect as it sits on top of the flowers--just a great capture! Regarding the color, etc, I would say you could make the image pop a bit more with some additional curves work or use the 'local contast' technique (both Artie and Robert teach this) on the insect's body. Bottom line, an exceptionally nice image.

    Keith

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics