Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Norfolk Island Gerygone

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Colin Driscoll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    2,344
    Threads
    431
    Thank You Posts

    Default Norfolk Island Gerygone

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    A small bird about 10 cm long caught by a ray of sunlight in dark rainforest.
    Canon EOS R5 RF100-500 @ 451 HH
    1/2000 f8 iso2500 manual
    ACR PS2024 cloned a couple of bight bits in BG, Light sharpening.

  2. #2
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,272
    Threads
    1,278
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Colin ... a kind of interesting shot of a bird I do not know and will never see
    I kind of like the image design and title .
    Interesting what you call " light sharpening " .... sharpening might be ok , but the contrast has killed the image for me personally . Blacks clipped to a large degree and the HL look blown or very very bright with no details showing .
    I think the image would benefit from a more gentle approach in processing of contrast and sharpening .... just my take . But you might see it differently

    TFS Andreas

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Colin Driscoll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    2,344
    Threads
    431
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Andreas, I have to push back, during processing I use an Action that shows up any blocked blacks or blown whites. Apart from blown white in the catchlight there were none of either.
    Yes it is bright but that was the circumstance, and I did soften blacks and whites.
    The raw image was very sharp, so used minimal just to cover for posting. Not sure what you mean about no details when individual barbs are visible throughout- on my screen at least.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,272
    Threads
    1,278
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Colin ... the feathers are showing very sharp ( too sharp for my taste ) as a result of strong lighting and you not taming the tones in the image , quite simple . If nothing is blown, then it should be easy to tame the very bright parts and tame the fully choked blacks to create more dynamic range for more VISIBLE NOT SHARPER DETAILS in the subject and the BG . Still maintaining the kind of stark contrast but even with hints of detail ion the BG . With missing details I was referring to featureless blocked or very very bright tones ....
    Not sure if your action works .... for the blacks/whites , at least the posted image shows blocked blacks .... not sure why one needs that action . Just look at the histogram .... it shows it all .

    But hey Colin , this is just my personal view if you think it works , fine . WE see things just differently , which is fully ok .

    Cheers Andreas

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Colin Driscoll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    2,344
    Threads
    431
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The Action does work, easy to test with a threshold layer. Not necessarily a matter of seeing things differently. This was the scene that I shot, full pollution-free sunlight hitting the subject in an otherwise very dark environment.
    Very different to the soft European light you work in.

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,344
    Threads
    2,668
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    An unusual shot, I appreciate the issue with the light. I think it might prove interesting to see different versions of the image.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics