Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Royal Tern

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,124
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default Royal Tern

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Photographed this Royal Tern 2 Sunday evening very close to sunset. From Midland Beach in Staten Island, New York. Every year in late October we get a large build up of these birds. Typically they are gone by early November. Evenings are the best time to try and photograph them because of the sun angle. Problem is that there are more people out on the beach at that time walking their dogs or just going for a stroll. These birds congregate on the least trafficked section of the beach. So I waited a bit away from the birds for them to be flushed by someone and hoped they would come to me. Thankfully the plan worked well. This shot is one of a flock that came in and landed very close to me.

    Canon 7d ii and Canon 500 f4 ii. f5, ISO 400, SS 1/4000, -1/3. Hand held. Full frame plus I added a tiny bit to the bottom in PS as the bottom was just a little too tight. Hand held.

    Converted in DPP 4. Auto white balance. In PS I added canvas to bottom, also took a little away from the right and added it to the left. Sharpened and applied noise reduction to background. Also cloned out a little beach debris and the beak of another tern that was on the far left of the screen.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Stoney Point, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6,868
    Threads
    512
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the IQ, incoming pose, HA, light, layered FG/BG and composition. Very well done Isaac!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
    Posts
    379
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great light and wing position. The stark stripes of the background colours distract from the subject a little bit but no big deal. Great work.

    TFS
    Geoff

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    985
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Such a beautiful light. I agree with Geoff regarding the BG but there is probably not much you can do about that. The near wing position is so good!

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Pune, Maharashtra, India
    Posts
    7,409
    Threads
    469
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very sweet image in wonderful lights. Love the way bird pops up against beautiful BG.
    Superb wing stretch and very nice HA.
    Great whites.

    Regards,
    Satish.

  6. #6
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Fabulous lighting, and a great capture. I like the comp and beautiful colours throughout the image. Well done Isaac, one of the best I have seen from your images.

    Will

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent fieldcraft!
    Great light and the whites are perfect.
    The tricolored BG is unusual and I would be tempted to desaturate the blues a bit,
    Gail

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,124
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks all. Gail, the background is interesting and one of the reasons I posted this shot. There are 2 small islands off of Staten Island, what you see above the water is that small island. There is nothing on the island but some trees and pilings. It is used by tons of cormorants and herons as a rookery. Where the birds were on the beach and to keep the sun at my back I had to shoot towards that island. I have mixed emotions about it and thought of cloning it out but decided it actually gave a kind of unique look so I decided to keep it. But I can totally see why others find it less than ideal. As to the water, this is an issue I have mentioned many times and really struggle with. I shoot almost exclusively in early morning or late evening light. Go out at those times to get that perfect soft and warm light. Of course it often over saturates the image. So the dilemma is do you intentionally shoot in that light but then tone down the image so it does not look like that or what? Kind of defeats the purpose a bit for me. I had this at f5 and the bird landed quite close. Shot is full frame so I got a real nice background blur that conveyed the brilliant late evening light. While processing it I left it as it was, but am never really sure what to do about that. I'd love to hear yours or others opinions about that. Same goes for the birds. In this case I did not touch the whites at all. Got them right in the field. Only lowered the highlights in DPP to -2. In PS I ran a NIK Detail extractor (50% opacity) and Tonal Contrast (25% opacity) filter and then sharpened. I left that beautiful warm light on the bird and thought it may look too artificial if I toned the background down so it didn't match the bird. Just explaining my thought process but am very eager to learn how others handle these situations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics