Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Grand Prismatic Morning: RAW or Well done?

  1. #1
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Rosemount, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    269
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default Grand Prismatic Morning: RAW or Well done?

    Hi all,

    I'm working on images from Yellowstone, and went one early morning to the Grand Prismatic area.

    Following are two images, and looking for feedback on if it's too "overcooked" in photoshop.

    The first is the image pretty much as shot with some minor adjustments in RAW.

    The second is using some contrast enhancements and a grad ND filter in post.

    Thanks for the feedback,
    PaulName:  z grand prismatic morning.jpg
Views: 84
Size:  331.5 KBName:  z grand prismatic enhanced.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  304.6 KB

  2. #2
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Rosemount, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    269
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This was shot with a Canon 7D Mark II, 10-22mm lens at 10mm, f10, ISO 200

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Schoharie, NY
    Posts
    71
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the foreground in the processed version, the sky is a bit much for my tastes though. I think there's a happy medium some where in there between the two versions, maybe dial back the contrast and play with saturation or perhaps split toning for some warmth in the highlights.

  4. #4
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Rosemount, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    269
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, working on it - I think I kind of like this version, a little lessName:  z gpme5.jpg
Views: 52
Size:  311.6 KB enhanced on the sky.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    2nd image OP looks overly cooked to me, especially the blue/black sky. The whole comp is a bit tight all round i feel..

  6. #6
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the composition in the original post best but prefer the lighting Pane #4...I would revisit your RAW file and get the light in the clouds to resemble that of Pane #4.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    985
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not an easy shot. I agree with Andrew's assessment here. The 2nd post in OP is definitely over cooked for me.

  8. #8
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Paul, Agree with Andrew rework the file on the fist image to give the clouds just a bit more pop and color but not as much as the second image in pane 1
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics