Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Grape bud

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default Grape bud

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I was rummaging around looking to thin out some old files and found this from three years ago. It is a stack of 21 shots done in PS, primitive by today's standards. Canon 5D3, Sigma 180 macro, ISO 100, f/10, 1/45 sec. I think the BG is distant grass or, more likely, trees. These grapes grow on our deck railing and for a brief time in spring the buds are a lovely magenta.

    I did a little retouching on the stack and lightened the tonalities a little.

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,349
    Threads
    2,669
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have but one reservation otherwise i think it really is a very good image indeed. The OOF stem on the LHS is way OOF and I feel it detracts from the beautiful bud and in the interesting tendril.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice Diane. The color and sharpness of the bud against a great background are pleasing. And the curved stem structure to the right of the bud, complete with fine spider web strands, adds interest. I agree with Jon's comment on the OOF stem, but I wonder if you couldn't Photoshop a terminus to that stem where it is still sharp. That would take this fine image to an even higher level.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant OvidiuCavasdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,054
    Threads
    237
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the colors and details on the bud, drops are a plus. The tendril is nice, also very clean BG. Agree about the OOF stem.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I often have a feeling that I want a sharply focused image to have an OOF feature as a sort of counterpoint, but sounds like the one here is not subtle enough. I'll revisit when I'm back home in a few days . I appreciate the feedback!!

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with all the comments above. Lovely detail and color against a perfectly smooth bg. That tendril adds a bit of tension and fun. Perhaps the OOF stem would work better if there were other elements that were OOF in other parts of the image. As it is, it is too stark.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    535
    Threads
    77
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My eyes like the frame as it is. Great colors, details and well balanced light. TFS.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hmmm.... good thought, Anita. I'll keep that in mind next time. Will look at pruning the most OOF areas.

    Thanks for the comments!

  9. #9
    Ron Conlon
    Guest

    Default

    I like where you were going with this composition. Perhaps cropping the left would put a little less attention on the oof branch. It isn't a biggie for me in any case. And from a general point of view, I like the idea of not editing out (or stacking in) every bit into pristine sharpness.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics