Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Red deer stag

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red deer stag

    Name:  _Z2T3709.jpg
Views: 84
Size:  311.6 KB

    Another one from last years rut - not been able to get out in decent light for this years season yet.

    Canon 1d3, 400mm and 1/1250th f6.3 ISO 800

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I've just setup a new computer at home with a new screen - looks good on there but awful now I'm looking at it on my laptop, so please feel free to be brutal, as I need to know which setup needs altering!

    Mike

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike, if your set-up at home is right, monitor calibrated etc, then there will be a certain amount of change, albeit slight to what you see on other screens. I have two 'edge to edge' 24" monitors side by side and they are fine, transfer the file to a laptop MacBook Pro, iPad, iPhone they will always look different, there are two many variables.

    Light looks quite strong giving a bold highlight down the neck, if this location is near then I would suggest early starts or towards dusk to get the best light, seems even after 8.30am the light may not be ideal may be changing position may have helped? It does however seem to provide a good BKG to separate the subject and to loose any distracting bushes/shrubs. Is this a crop and if so, by a large amount, as the subject isn't that sharp with lost detail sadly, there should be more definition on/around the head/rack. Just interested, but did you lighten the overall image, it looks quite 'coarse/grainy' for ISO 800, even on the 1DMK3. I do however like the posture of the bellowing stag, but again, due to the light a lot of detail is blown around the mouth and I might be tempted to run a little NR on the BKG.

    TFS
    Steve

  4. Thanks Mike Poole thanked for this post
  5. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike - great bugling pose and the color/light on the grasses. It's one of those tough exposure situations where if you expose to get detail on the side of the face, you're going to blow the highlights. If you expose for the highlights, you won't have much detail on the face. Steve has covered the problems well.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  6. Thanks Mike Poole thanked for this post
  7. #5
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for looking and commenting.

    Steve, I think of broke the cardinal rule here of trying to polish a - well - wasted frame. I like to try and get something different from lighting angles whever possible, but on this occasion it was too much to work with to get a decent result.

    My new screen seems to be asking for the brightness to be set low down, so when I've processed shots on it, a few people have started commenting on the brightness levels, I'll re-calibrate.

    Rachel, thanks for commenting but ultimately I think it's headed for the bin!

    regards

    Mike

  8. #6
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    There was potential here, Mike...but as you said it's probably a "wasted frame", more's the pity...
    Can't add more to what Rachel and Steve have pointed out.
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  9. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike you are correct, if it's not sharp, lacks detail, or you have to crop hard, move on. Regarding your monitor you need to get on top of calibration & output, otherwise you will be in the same camp as the image. Obviously Mike not knowing what you have, where you have placed it within the room, the ambient light/lighting, what you are using to calibrate the screen, it's hard to advise, but once you have cracked it then calibrate once a month or when it tells you i.e. after 300hrs and if it's a brand new monitor then it may need calibrating in a very short space of time, as monitors 'drift' when new, then settle down.

  10. #8
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Mike you are correct, if it's not sharp, lacks detail, or you have to crop hard, move on. Regarding your monitor you need to get on top of calibration & output, otherwise you will be in the same camp as the image. Obviously Mike not knowing what you have, where you have placed it within the room, the ambient light/lighting, what you are using to calibrate the screen, it's hard to advise, but once you have cracked it then calibrate once a month or when it tells you i.e. after 300hrs and if it's a brand new monitor then it may need calibrating in a very short space of time, as monitors 'drift' when new, then settle down.
    Thanks Steve, the monitor is a dell ultrasharp 2414H. I got that as I believed it could be hardware calibrated with the x-rite i1 display pro, but it now appears that with a mac its software calibration only.

    Ii's in my box room (actually now it's been converted into my 'man-cave!) with a window off to the side and I'm going to look into if i need to change the light bulb. I'll do a bit more research over gamma etc...

  11. #9
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,344
    Threads
    2,668
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like it - the dynamic range is outside the camera's range but I think the image presented is great. Some highlights on the chest are blown but it doesn't seem to matter to me because the image as a whole comes together, it is the sort of scene you may occasionally see and the first thing anyone would do is wish they had a camera with them.

  12. Thanks Mike Poole thanked for this post
  13. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike, like the sound of a 'Man cave' cool, just don't hibernate there though!

    I'll try and send a PM over the week with some pointers which may/may not help??? Just don't by a ColourChecker Passport!

  14. Thanks Mike Poole thanked for this post
  15. #11
    Lifetime Member Mike Poole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    3,251
    Threads
    314
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve, if you do get a spare 5 mins, it would be very much appreciated

    Mike

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics