Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: ***Adult Fox : A Portrait #2***

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sherbrooke, Québec
    Posts
    264
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default ***Adult Fox : A Portrait #2***

    Here is another one of this collaborative fox.



    Canon EOS 7D Canon IS 600 mm 1:4,0 - 1/1600s f/4.0 iso800 Full Frame

    C&C : thanks!

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,688
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Yves, IQ is a lot better on this posting, likewise the colour, although the OOF vegetation is the FG is a little distracting running over part of the face. Did you add any saturation, as the BG colour looks a little pushed IMHO. I also think you could lose a little off the top.

    Base on an earlier reply, this image look/appears to have more done to it ie in its processing, has it?

    Please note maximum height is 800px not 1024px, please ensure you keep to this for future posting and also there is no need for the stars in the title, keep things simple, thanks.

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sherbrooke, Québec
    Posts
    264
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My usual workflow : converted in ACR with clarity, vibrance, saturation at +10; contrast : +50; resize at 1024 (sorry for this vertical) and my special script (action). That's it!

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,688
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yves, the only reason I asked was based on your reply to one of your threads (see below), therefore I assume this is not going in any competition? I am surprised that NO didgital manipulation is allowed in you comps, as in it's nature digital files need to be at least sharpened. Most International comps do allow some manipulation (simple tweaks), but cloning is a NO NO, however when you get to the finals they do ask for the RAW so they can compare.

    I have recently participated in some photo contests where it was mandatory NOT to manipulate digitally the photos.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics