Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Red Kite (Milvus milvus)

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portalegre, Portugal
    Posts
    546
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red Kite (Milvus milvus)

    Like I said in my previous post, I have 1/8000 of a sec at f/5.6, because the kite was in a tree with dark green BG, it was early morning and I needed ISO 800 to get decent exposures, suddenly he took of and only had time to change exposure.
    As I'm initiating BIF I need critics and advices.
    Thanks...

    Name:  _K5G8460_900px.jpg
Views: 76
Size:  98.0 KB

    Canon 1D IV+Canon 600 f/4, Hide
    1/8000 at f/5.6, -1/3 EV, ISO 800

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC
    Posts
    886
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks sharp! Looks grainy underneath the wings. Maybe some more NR? I do like the head angle and the lighting works very well too.

  3. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  4. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portalegre, Portugal
    Posts
    546
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks colin, I did some shadows recover on Lightroom but no NR, because was afraid of lose some detail.

  5. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg - South Africa
    Posts
    2,114
    Threads
    190
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks very sharp, nicely done. I would have gone with a bit more shadow recovery under the wings though TFS

  6. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  7. #5
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great stare, and I like the hint of clouds in the sky. There may be a faint trace on PP artifact around the flared primaries; hard to tell on my screen. And I would also vote for just a little more shadow recovery under the wings if it doesn't make the noise worse.

  8. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  9. #6
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Umberto, good ss to create excellent sharpness, and I like the attentive stare. Clouds always adds that something extra to a sky BG.

    When shooting into the sky on a 'darker' subject, I normally use a + EC to bring out more detail. Its a matter of experimenting and see what results you get. I see your setting was with a - EC, thus the lack of detail on the underwings. Different species will render different results. After time, you will nail it each shot.

  10. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  11. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Stoney Point, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6,868
    Threads
    512
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the sharpness, stare and cloud/sky BG. Well done Humberto!

  12. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  13. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Alentejo - Portugal
    Posts
    150
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Humberto
    For me the biggest dificullty in the BIF photos is also the shadow zone underneath the wings, like Stuart says I normally also use negative EC's
    I like the photo. One thing that I like that's not been said is the diagonal created by the bird in the frame.
    Last edited by Tiago Caravana; 05-29-2012 at 01:10 PM.

  14. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  15. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portalegre, Portugal
    Posts
    546
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart Bowie View Post
    Hi Umberto, good ss to create excellent sharpness, and I like the attentive stare. Clouds always adds that something extra to a sky BG.

    When shooting into the sky on a 'darker' subject, I normally use a + EC to bring out more detail. Its a matter of experimenting and see what results you get. I see your setting was with a - EC, thus the lack of detail on the underwings. Different species will render different results. After time, you will nail it each shot.
    Hi Stuard,

    I also use more EC on white BG, but I was using spot metering on the bird head and even with -1/3 EC, the whites in the head almost blowed.

  16. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portalegre, Portugal
    Posts
    546
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago Caravana View Post
    Hello Humberto
    For me the biggest dificullty in the BIF photos is also the shadow zone underneath the wings, like Stuart says I normally also use negative EC's
    I like the photo. One thing that I like that's not been said is the diagonal created by the bird in the frame.
    Hi Tiago, welcome to BPN community,

    I think Stuard said + EC, normally in white bG, the camera tends to darker the image to get the correct exposure of the sky, if you compensate this adding some more exposure, you will get the subject well exposed and the sky in this case more white, you can also add more EC to try to expose right without burning the whites. And then in post-processing you decrease the exposure selective to try to get all the bird with the right exposure, doing this you will have less noise.

    Its very strange to me to wright in English to a Portuguese
    Last edited by Humberto Ramos; 05-29-2012 at 02:53 PM.

  17. #11
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You explained it perfectly.

  18. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  19. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Alentejo - Portugal
    Posts
    150
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Of course! I wanted to say positive instead of negative EC. Alentejo skies are normally very bright
    Thanks for noticing it :)

  20. Thanks Humberto Ramos thanked for this post
  21. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portalegre, Portugal
    Posts
    546
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Dix View Post
    Great stare, and I like the hint of clouds in the sky. There may be a faint trace on PP artifact around the flared primaries; hard to tell on my screen. And I would also vote for just a little more shadow recovery under the wings if it doesn't make the noise worse.
    Thanks Bill, but I don't see no artifacts.

    Here is a 100% view of the wings...

    Name:  _K5G8460_wings.jpg
Views: 53
Size:  118.8 KB

  22. #14
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It has all been said. I would like a tighter crop.
    Gail

  23. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Geldern, Germany
    Posts
    3,557
    Threads
    216
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Really nice flight shot and great details.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics