Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Red-Headed Woodpecker

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waveland, MS
    Posts
    48
    Threads
    19
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red-Headed Woodpecker

    I've been photographing a pair of woodpeckers who live in a tree down the street. A few days ago I was out at daybreak, and the "golden hour" was exceptionally golden (I should have been down at the beach taking sunrise pix!!). I thought this one came out pretty good (especially since I was pushing the limits of my T1i at ISO 800). In addition to basic NR, levels and curves adjustments, I applied Nik's Color Efex "Pro Contrast" filter and added a little blur to the OOF background. C&C welcome.

    Taken at 0655 hours
    Canon T1i
    Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L lens with EF 1.4x III extender
    1/500 second, f/8, ISO 800


    Red-Headed Woodpecker by ScubaDude1960, on Flickr

  2. #2
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Eric, you took on a difficult situation here, as the background looks a lot like the foreground and there is a dark area behind the bird. This makes the bird blend in a bit, where a blue sky or OOF greenery would make him stand out. You have a good head angle, sharp eye, and pretty good exposure. The peak whites are too hot and you lost detail in the capture, especially in the rump and breast areas. I would crop in closer from the lower right corner and a little bit from the left.
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  3. Thanks Eric Freeman thanked for this post
  4. #3
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Eric,

    The general rule with this type of composition is 1/3 tree 1/3 subject and 1/3 sky or clean background. Having a duplicate background is distracting remember the background is as important as the subject it must be controlled and the image must have harmony,..balance,...

    Kerry's provided good overall comments and remember you should set the exposure techs to compensate for the bright whites first. Once you get one color right the rest should fall in place. The bright are always the first thing to address IMO. This subject is about 30% white feathers you need to ensure the histogram is not clipped on the right. That means a faster shutter especially at ISO 800 - I think at that ISO the sunny 16 rule for f/8.0 is 1/3200. Keep em coming, posting is the beat way to improve.

  5. Thanks Eric Freeman thanked for this post
  6. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waveland, MS
    Posts
    48
    Threads
    19
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanx for the C&C, Jeff. Unfortunately, the only spot to get a shot of the nesting hole puts that other tree in the background. I could move in closer, but then I'd be looking up at the hole. I did separate the background and give it some extra blur, which helped some. Due to the high ISO, my dynamic range was narrowed to the point where both the darkest blacks and the brightest whites were clipped. I will probably try lowering the ISO and shutter speed next time (I was hoping to get some BIF shots of the bird taking off, but the shutter lag prevented me from getting any keepers). I think I'm finally outgrowing my T1i; it, rather than I, seems to be the weakest link. Now, I'm just waiting on the 7D's replacement (and, waiting for my wife's approval... I spent about $6000 on gear since getting my T1i a year ago).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics