Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Nikon 600/4 AFS 2 still a good buy?

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    30
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default Nikon 600/4 AFS 2 still a good buy?

    I recently moved from Canon to Nikon and use the 200-400 VR but as i am mainly a birdphotographer i do find i am at times mm short! I do not want to start a discussion about the 600VR. I cant get one overhere in the Uk anyway and it is too expesnive. However i have been offered a demo 600 AFS 2 for a good price and was wondering what the consensus is on this lens. I would use it with a D3 and a D300.
    Many thanks for your help
    Rene de Heer

  2. #2
    Larry Daniel
    Guest

    Default

    I like the one I have. Requires good long lens technique. Works well with both the D3 and D300.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    3
    Threads
    1
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The 600mm VR doesn't seem to be available here in the US either. I've had an order placed with Calumet since last fall. But the 600mm AF-S II is a great lens, and works well with the 1.4x and 1.7x TCs, especially in combination with a D3 or D300. You'll need a gimbal head, and/or a substantial ballhead, and a sturdy tripod. The added reach over the 200-400mm VR is particularly advantageous when photographing small birds.

  4. #4
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    I'm using the new VR and like it It is a significant improvement Not sure what the price difference would be? In the original purchase also consider you will be selling some day Would go for the VR !!!

    btw might want to look at this thread Have a test image posted with the 600 VR taken at 1/25 sec Don't think it would have been possible with the non VR?

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ead.php?t=9235

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I came over from Canon with a 500 IS 2 years ago to Nikon with a 500 afs-1. I did have a learning adjustment. Without IS (VR) you do need to concentrate more on long lens technique.

  6. #6
    Art Peslak
    Guest

    Default

    I switched to nikon several months ago. I didn't want to wait a year for the VR lens so I got a good deal on a new 600 AFS-II for about $1100 less than the vr version. I am very pleased with it on the D3 with either the 1.4 or 1.7 TC. It does require a little more careful technique especially when the wind is blowing across and catching the lens hood.

  7. #7
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Would recommend the VR version Rene. You dont mention the non VR discount, but I dont think it would be worth giving up VR (as you can tell I am a huge believer in VR and IS).
    I have had clients travel to the US from the UK to buy a lens on holiday, the savings paid for the trip (the VR lenses are in short supply here also).

    Here is an interesting related IS/VR thread :http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ead.php?t=8094

    Robert

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics