Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: HOUSE fINCH (PRACTICE!)

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Angels Camp, CA
    Posts
    213
    Threads
    55
    Thank You Posts

    Default HOUSE fINCH (PRACTICE!)

    Name:  100512_RSM6551-copy.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  230.0 KBNew glasses, Lens re-calibrated by Nikon. Software: PS5, Imagenomic, Viveza 2, PKSharpener and cropped for presentation.

    hutter speed: 1/250 sec
    Aperture: 11
    Exposure mode: Av
    Flash: On
    Metering mode: Multi-segment
    ISO: 400
    Lens: 200 to 400mm
    Focal length: 450mm
    Focal length: 675mm (in 35mm film)
    Subject distance: 5.0 m
    White balance: Auto
    Color space: AdobeRGB
    Saturation: Normal
    Sharpness: High
    Contrast: Normal
    Color profile: Adobe RGB (1998)

    C&C appreciated.
    Rob..........
    Last edited by Rob Miner; 05-01-2012 at 02:52 PM.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    it's a nice pose and BG but processing is poor. it looks like a water color painting as opposed to a photograph. need to revisit post processing.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  3. #3
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It is a nice watercolor, maybe OOTB?
    Dan Kearl

  4. #4
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    I agree that it looks like something went wrong during processing as there are no details on the bird and perc.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,997
    Threads
    86
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yikes. There was definitely something that went wrong in the processing of this image,
    and it's all the more glaring due to the size of the subject in the frame. One idea for this
    approach would be to lower the set up so that it's more eye level. Then back up a bit to
    achieve a smaller size subject in the frame. Looks like the background is far enough away
    that you will still have good background control....

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Angels Camp, CA
    Posts
    213
    Threads
    55
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you for taking the time to critique the above image. It made me aware of my mistakes in workflow. Hopefully, the same mistakes will not raise their ugly heads again.

    Name:  100512_RSM6551-copy.jpg
Views: 33
Size:  231.7 KB

    Rob................

  7. #7
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Much better but still doesn't look natural I'm afraid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics