Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Piping Plover

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default Piping Plover

    I thought to try my new D800 on piping plovers. I like the result though I must think of shallow dof more.
    D800 with 600VR and 14TC
    1/1000 at f5.6; iso 250
    Name:  _DAA2680bpn.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  172.7 KB

  2. #2
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    great light and separation from the BG here Allan...the OOF sand in front grabs my attention quite a bit because of the way it obscures the base of the plane of focus...
    how much of a crop is this?
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would say this is 80-85% of the full image file.

  4. #4
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    The bird looks good with excellent exposure and sharp. The oof FG is a bit distracting IMHO.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Oh yes it s. that is why I said I will have to adjust to full frame.

  6. #6
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allan, as i said on the post in ETL, you do not have to worry about getting closer with FX with the D800.
    You can just crop instead of the camera. It will still have more pixels than any DX camera.
    No need to shoot wide open at iso 250. You can stop down and use base iso of at least 1000 with the D800 and not
    even need NR.
    See the Flicker post above, 10% of the original at iso800. I used NR on the Bg only, not the bird or the tree.
    Dan Kearl

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rotonda West , FL
    Posts
    3,642
    Threads
    198
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice pose and setting. perhaps a pano crop to eliminate some oof front?

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would rather not start with the idea I would need to crop heavily.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,997
    Threads
    86
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Exposure is perfect, lots of details visible in the whites. Light quality is good, and the subject
    pops well against the perfectly smooth background. Nit mentioned.
    Question...why not just elevate your shooting angle a bit for this one and then angle down
    just a bit to stretch the plane of focus, and or back up a just slightly to gain more dof?
    Would that not have helped to lessen the impact of the oof foreground?

  10. #10
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allan, my point was not that you have to crop heavily.
    Your DX was cropping for you, so you just take the same photo from the same distance and crop yourself.
    Do what you want, I was just giving you my opinion.
    I just don't see the reasoning behind having to get closer with FX.
    The DX was not getting you closer.
    Dan Kearl

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    More pixels on subject.
    However, I do hear what you are saying Dan. I think if I had been higher the image would be better. was guilty of "lower is better."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics