Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Fred Miranda reviews 5Dmk3 vs D800

  1. #1
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default Fred Miranda reviews 5Dmk3 vs D800

    Some may have seen this - very interesting results!

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/5DIII-D800/index.html

    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  2. Thanks fabiobernardino thanked for this post
  3. #2
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas.
    Posts
    6,260
    Threads
    426
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    thx for the link, Morkel.

  4. #3
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas.
    Posts
    6,260
    Threads
    426
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Interesting read. Nikon definitely seems to have achieved success in making pixel pitch small and not compromise on the noise front. It'd be interesting to see what can Canon do on that front. They seem to have focussed more on lenses, AF and video in the recent past.

    Having said that, I'd rather have Canon take time and deliver something "very good" later than hastily come up with a high MP body that is not up to the mark...both in APS-C segment and full frame.

  5. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,042
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Morkel,
    interesting reading, but rather strange methodology, using a Novoflex adaptor on a Nikon mount lens on the 5Dmk3? And no explanation of what method used for "upsizing" the 5D mk3 files, we assume Photoshop?. His conclusions rather pointless to me in that regard. Great images in the review.
    cheers
    Grant

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics