Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Inquisitive Pup

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Inquisitive Pup

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another from my 2009 trip to the Sabi Sands in South Africa. This wild dog pup approached briefly for a closer look.

    Canon 50D
    100-400 @400mm
    1/400
    f7.1
    ISO 200
    HH from a safari vehicle, cropped from horizontal, luminosity mask, s/h, levels, curves, sharpened in CS5.

    C&C welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

    Rachel

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice on your face portrait Rachel. Shallow DOF is working great here and like the tight composition. Very well done.

  3. #3
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Rachel,

    This is a beauty!

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,058
    Threads
    101
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great work on the detail Rachel and nice crop.

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very, very nice Rachel, seems like it's all taking shape and the PS work is in the bag.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Sid, Ken, Jamie and Steve for the kind comments, much appreciated.

    Rachel

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry but for me the angle of the light, face shadowed, does not work.
    Tom

  8. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry but for me the angle of the light, face shadowed, does not work.
    So what improvements, steps would you suggest then Tom?
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    First, go to to our Roger Clark's web site and study his article on light and light phase angle. http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/...ect/index.html
    In this image here the "negative phase angle", using Roger's terms, between light source and camera is too large, perhaps negative 120 degrees?
    Sometimes the subject, the light source, and our camera do not, can not, position to make an excellent image. That is wildlife photography.
    Tom
    ps - when the phase angle becomes extreme at around 180 then we have "back lit" and this offers totally different image possibilities.

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    So Tom, in a situation as here, where the light angle could not be optimally aligned, would you simply not take the photo? Or would you not try to make the best of it? Unfortunately, as you alluded to and because it is wildlife. we cannot always control the light angle or the shooting conditions. We do the best we can and still take photos. Personally, I feel that I've brought out good detail despite the shadow (which was caused by the pup's moving closer to the vehicle) and am happy with the results. While we can do our best to position ourselves correctly, if you spend your life waiting for all conditions to be perfect (or repositioning the vehicle), you'll miss out on a lot of good opportunities and images in the interim.

    Rachel

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer Steve Canuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Threads
    444
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sharpness across the eye, nose, and the fur in between trumps any lacking of phase angle for me. I also like the almost sepia tone to the image.

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks very much Steve.

  13. #13
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Hollander View Post
    So Tom, in a situation as here, where the light angle could not be optimally aligned, would you simply not take the photo? Or would you not try to make the best of it? Unfortunately, as you alluded to and because it is wildlife. we cannot always control the light angle or the shooting conditions. We do the best we can and still take photos. Personally, I feel that I've brought out good detail despite the shadow (which was caused by the pup's moving closer to the vehicle) and am happy with the results. While we can do our best to position ourselves correctly, if you spend your life waiting for all conditions to be perfect (or repositioning the vehicle), you'll miss out on a lot of good opportunities and images in the interim.

    Rachel
    Fully agree with you here, Rachel.
    You did very well with the choice of comp/crop here and good detail is visible. Might try just dodging some of the shadows and midtones a tad to bring out some more??
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  14. #14
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Repost

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks Morkel for the suggestions. Here's a repost

    Rachel

  15. #15
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That's more like it ...now the facial detail is more arresting.
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  16. #16
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks very much Morkel

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    George, South Africa
    Posts
    1,462
    Threads
    255
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel

    I like the image , the intense stare that caught my attention first .
    Photography will always attract people who approach photography from a scientific Bkg who believe that a sucessful image must adhere to set rules, and the other extreme are those from a creative Bkg who believe in no rules what so ever.
    I believe a photographer wishing to create a good image must balance both , the heart and the mind so to speak.
    In this image, you tried to be creative with your crop... And you got the technicals correct as best you could under the circumstances.
    And most importantly you got the shot...

    Peter

  18. #18
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Peter, I think you summed up the balance of art and science well.

  19. #19
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter delaney View Post
    Hi Rachel

    I like the image , the intense stare that caught my attention first .
    Photography will always attract people who approach photography from a scientific Bkg who believe that a sucessful image must adhere to set rules, and the other extreme are those from a creative Bkg who believe in no rules what so ever.
    I believe a photographer wishing to create a good image must balance both , the heart and the mind so to speak.
    In this image, you tried to be creative with your crop... And you got the technicals correct as best you could under the circumstances.
    And most importantly you got the shot...

    Peter
    Peter.

    Just to say (a bit late) that I agree entirely with your comments. rules are meant to be broken!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics