Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Puffy Piping Plover

  1. #1
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    51
    Threads
    21
    Thank You Posts

    Default Puffy Piping Plover

    These guys showed back up here last week and I needed to improve my shots on them, so I headed down to the shore this AM after failing miserably Thursday due to fog. As soon as I hit the beach I saw two--which quickly turned to at least 7. I spent a few minutes trying to follow them, and eventually gave up and just parked myself on the beach.

    I apparently got lucky in my kneeling choice, because I had 7+ start up their displaying all around me for the better part of an hour. I took a ton of pics, and narrowed it down to a few. I *think* I like this one the best, due to angle and pose.

    I cropped maybe 25% of the original shot, and only did some minor tweaks of temp and fill light.

    Nikon D300, Sigma 500mm + 2x TC, f 5.6, 1/640 sec @ ISO 200, EC -0.7.

    Name:  p744784477-4.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  162.7 KB

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the seashell "perch" and the HA. The head is not tack sharp and I would work on some sharpening. I would clone out the branch in RUC as well and add more room on the right,
    gail
    PS you can post bigger at 1024 x 800 pixels

  3. #3
    Forum Participant christopher galeski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ENGLAND LANCASHIRE
    Posts
    5,106
    Threads
    360
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    nice image and nice pose,agree on comments made by Gail.thanks.

  4. #4
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas.
    Posts
    6,260
    Threads
    426
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Joseph, I liked the low angle and the pose. nice habitat as well. The main issue here is that of critical AF point DOF coverage. You were working with high focal length and were quite close. Since you had plenty headroom on the ISO front, it would have been wise to stop down. what was the f-stop? f5.6 must be a typo since you had 500 and 2xtc. Critical AF does not seem to be on the eye. If mine, I'd crop some from bottom.

  5. #5
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    51
    Threads
    21
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Kaustubh-

    I suppose technically it was a typo. My camera doesn't read the 2x tc and my f/stop was set on 5.6 prior. The lens is a 4.5, and I suppose in hind-sight I should have stopped down even more on the non-tc photos. It's entirely possible that I missed critical focus on the eye...I was laying in the sand and shooting in MF. I've got a couple of others from that set that I'll need to look a little more closely at.

    Thanks for the critiques everyone!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics