Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Canon 400 f5.6 vs Canon 300 f2.8 with x1.4 conveeter for BIF

  1. #1
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default Canon 400 f5.6 vs Canon 300 f2.8 with x1.4 converter for BIF

    Hi all,I own the Canon 300 f2.8 (old type) and I use it with the 1.4 converter for BIF. I got an opportunity to buy a great Canon 400mm f5.6 in cheap price and wonder if I really need it considering the 420mm combo (300 plus x1.4).Would love to hear your thoughts.Thanks,Ofer

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    If you like to do flight at that focal length, the 400mm f/5.6 is awesome. Very lightweight, sharp wide open, and fast to acquire focus. It's also much less expensive and lighter weight than a 300mm f/2.8 with TC. I'm guessing image quality will be comparable.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  3. #3
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    If you like to do flight at that focal length, the 400mm f/5.6 is awesome. Very lightweight, sharp wide open, and fast to acquire focus. It's also much less expensive and lighter weight than a 300mm f/2.8 with TC. I'm guessing image quality will be comparable.
    Thanks Doug, I already own the 300 f2.8 but wonder whether I should also get the 400 f5.6 or is it a waste of money...

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    28
    Threads
    10
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    If you already own the 300mm + 1.4 extender combo, I don't think you would be gaining all that much with the 400 f/5.6. You have a combination that equals 420mm f/4 with image quality that as far as I know is pretty similar to the 400mm. The 400mm is lighter in weight but that's probably the only major advantage you would get.
    That said I've been using the 400 f/5.6 for BIF shots for a few years now and absolutely love it. I'm just not sure you would be gaining enough to justify the expense.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,949
    Threads
    254
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ofer,
    The MTF charts show the 300 f/2.8 version 1 is substantially sharper without a TC at f/2.8 than the 400 f/5.6 (they do not show the version 1 with TCs). The 300 version II is sharper with a 2x TC III over the 1DIV image area than the 400 f/5.6 with no TCs and with the 1.4x is markedly better. Form the data, I infer the 300 version 1 plus 1.4x TC should be at least as good as the 400 f/5.6 if not slightly better. I find the 300 f/2.8 (version 1) with TCs very impressive. But the 400 f/5.6 weighs less.

    Roger

  6. #6
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I had one of these and sometimes miss it. feather light and easy to carry especially when you are scouting. can't go wrong. It's a popular lens, if you end up not using it you can sell quickly...
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Barnstaple,South West England
    Posts
    155
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have owned both the lenses over the past few years and would say that the IQ of the 300/2.8 + 1.4x tc against the bare 400/5.6 is fairly even. For BIF I certainly prefer the 400/5.6 for its lightness and marginally faster AF.

  8. #8
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks for your great input guys! I think I will skip it....

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    118
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    I had one of these and sometimes miss it. feather light and easy to carry especially when you are scouting. can't go wrong. It's a popular lens, if you end up not using it you can sell quickly...
    Don't be so sure. I've been trying to sell a 400 f/5.6L for months at about 75% of new price with no takers. Oh well. Now it looks like that lens is going to make a trip to Cuba with me where I don't want to be carrying a lot of weight, so one way or another it works out. :-)

  10. #10
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elliotte Rusty Harold View Post
    Don't be so sure. I've been trying to sell a 400 f/5.6L for months at about 75% of new price with no takers. Oh well. Now it looks like that lens is going to make a trip to Cuba with me where I don't want to be carrying a lot of weight, so one way or another it works out. :-)
    here is how to sell one in less than 3 days!

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/board/10
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer Mark Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    797
    Threads
    68
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ofer Levy View Post
    Hi all,I own the Canon 300 f2.8 (old type) and I use it with the 1.4 converter for BIF. I got an opportunity to buy a great Canon 400mm f5.6 in cheap price and wonder if I really need it considering the 420mm combo (300 plus x1.4).Would love to hear your thoughts.Thanks,Ofer
    That explains your comment from the other day.

    I can't speak for the 300 f2.8, but I use the 300 4.5 with a 1.4tc and I find the 1.4 slows down the autofocus when compared with not using a TC. The slowness might not be as pronounced with the 2.8, but I'm not a camera buff so I can't be sure. The 300 f4.5 was working pretty nicely for the BIF images I was going for the other day with those Gulls and Terns. For non BIF shots the 1.4tc is fine, but for BIF's taking the TC off makes a noticeable difference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics