Since everyone else is answering Artie's question to Roger, I'll chime in here too. I find the easiest way to get a quick and dirty feel for comparing resolution on cropped and non-cropped cameras is to square the crop factor multiplied by the number of pixels. This will give you the approximate number of MP that a cropped camera would be if it were a full-frame camera. You don't even need to know the pixel size in order to figure this out.
For example:
1D Mark IV: 16MP * 1.3 * 1.3 = 27MP
1D Mark III: 10MP * 1.3 * 1.3 = 17MP
7D: 18MP * 1.6 * 1.6 = 42MP
From the above examples, you can see that the Mark IV @27MP (full-frame equivalent) should still out-resolve the 5D Mark III, but it isn't by much, plus newer technology might even the playing field resolution/quality wise. I believe they will be very, very close.
As stated above, the 1D Mark III @ 17MP (full-frame Equivalent) is almost identical to the 1DX @ 18MP. Again, until we see the raw images, we won't know how newer technology plays into the resolution/quality.
Alan
www.iwishicouldfly.com