Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: European Kestrel

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    123
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default European Kestrel

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nikon D70, Nikkor 80-400 at 400mm, f8, 1/1250s, ISO200. spot metering

    Shot at a free flight demo, Adler and Wolfspark Kasselburg, Germany. Original was about 1 stop underexposed and the kestrel's right wing was slightly clipped. Original sky was overcast and has been replaced in this composite with a cloudy sky from a different shot.

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Very cool pose and eye contact. The underexposure really hurt the image as it looks a bit noisy and the bird needs a few new feathers. :)

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    2,109
    Threads
    65
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dieter
    I agree with Axel on the underexposure. However, the pose is fantastic and the clouds in the sky certainly add to the depth.

  4. #4
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Excellent capture Dieter !!!! Sure wish you would get away from spot metering No clue how it could help you come up with an exposure for this situations.

    Doing other type of photography I did use a spot meter a lot. Even got a Zone V1 modified Pentax One Degree meter. I find the matrix or multi to be more useful Can even just take a reading the shoot manual

    Any way love the pose and great detail One smoking image !!! Big Congrats !!!!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    123
    Threads
    16
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, everyone.

    Alfred - initially I have been using the matrix metering - resulted in a lot of overexposed images though - and I had a hard time dialing in exposure corrections for consistent results. With spot metering I feel I have a good handle on the necessary exposure correction - if I have the time to dial them in (which wasn't the case for the shot above). Given the lighting, I'd probably had dialed in about +1 or +1 1/3 exposure correction, saving me the trouble with the noise in the current image.

    However, I have started again to evaluate my position on spot vs matrix metering and am giving the later a shot again - looks like I just need to dial in some negative EV most of the time.

  6. #6
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Excellent image Dieter,
    Love that dive bomber flight angle...very nice indeed...:D The colors and details on your subject work for me...:) Keep them coming....:cool:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics