Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Blue Tit

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default Blue Tit

    Photographed this today in very cold weather with poor light. Comments would be very welcomed:

    Canon 7D, 100-400mm at 400mm, ISO1250, f/6.1, 1/320ss evaluative metering.

    Post processed in lightroom 3 with some sharpening and noise reduction, etc.


  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Simon, these are great little characters and are having a busy time at present, feeding vigorously out in the hedgerow and garden feeders, stocking up for winter.

    I like the side profile and there is some nice detail in the wing and plumage, but I might just add a bit more in Curves to give the bird a bit more 'pop'. I would also drop the blue coming through on the log using an adjustment mask so you only apply it to the areas required. Personally I would like to see more room in front of the bird for it to look into, basically if you could flipped the bird only, that then would give you the right space left & right IMHO. I would also lose the red (flower/berry?) in the BKG as it is a little distracting. Hope this helps.

    Not sure where you were shooting this afternoon, but he light from 2-3.30pm this afternoon in Yorkshire was glorious.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Steve for the reply and advice. Yes, agree with your comments. I've posted a tweaked photo for comments if thats ok.


  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think that is much better, but more to the point, WDYT?

    I might if you have the time now just soften the curve, probably of a branch that kind of echoes the back of the bird and the darker area by your © wording.

    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northamptonshire, UK
    Posts
    451
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Steve, I think it looks a lot better. I still need to learn to take more time processing my images and look for the fine details you have mentioned. Thanks again.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent suggestions by Steve Simon. Reports takes it to next level.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Simon, if this is what you like to photograph you are in safe hands here on the Avian Forum with people who shoot birds more than I do and have greater experience in all areas and can help you develop your passion, but you are most welcome. Take some time to look through the other parts of the Forum, as there are some great nuggets of info peppered around. You might also like to take a look at this area too, good luck.

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...onal-Resources

    BTW never worry about asking on here.

    Thanks Sid.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I rather liked the interesting out of the box COMP with the ORIG post but obviously the repost looks better with the increased contrast. As presented the repost could benefit from some Eye Doctor work and some background smoothing with a 40% hardness Clone Stamp Tool to eliminate the large, o-o-f branches. Did you have the whole red flower in the original capture? I liked that.

    BTW, welcome to Avian.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  9. #9
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely done Simon. Sharp and lots of fine detail and at a high ISO for the 7D. I like the interesting perch. Lots of good suggestions by Steve.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics