-
BPN Member
-
Hi Morkel.
Thanks for another interesting night sky photograph. I like the star-studded sky, the placement of the tree, and your comments about the foreground.
But while I understand the need for subdued illumination under the circumstances, I find the image to be a bit too dark overall. I've experimented a little with your image using the Photoshop levels middle slider, and I find that with a very modest adjustment, the image can be made more to my liking. You might consider doing that.
But it is very nice as posted, and I appreciate your story of how you illuminated the foreground.
Norm
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
-
Landscapes Moderator
Hi Morkel, I like this one as is. I think you achieved your goal nicely of creating the nocturnal feel with the subdued painting. Nice work!
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-

Originally Posted by
Morkel Erasmus
Thanks for your thoughts, Norm. I used to illuminate the FG a lot more but lately I have found that I prefer the "painting" to be more subdued in keeping with the nocturnal feeling. One needs to get the feeling that it was shot at night despite the illumination, if you know what I mean?

I understand your new approach, and I appreciate it. I think you are on to something good.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Hey Morkel,
Nice job with the illumination! I think you can go both ways with a bit more agressive painting or as in this case....a bit less. I like this as presented too with great placement of the tree.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Hi Morkel,
Very nice image. I like the mood here a lot. But the Pleiades are upside down!
I like the idea of bouncing the light off your hand. I really dislike the blue cast of LED lights, so a nice simple solution. What kind of light are you using (any idea of the lumen output)?
Many of your stars appear white. Did you use levels to bring the intensity up? If not, what processing?
Roger
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member

Originally Posted by
Roger Clark
But the Pleiades are upside down!
Are you sure you weren't a bit tipsy when viewing this, Roger? 

Originally Posted by
Roger Clark
I like the idea of bouncing the light off your hand. I really dislike the blue cast of LED lights, so a nice simple solution. What kind of light are you using (any idea of the lumen output)
Thanks Roger. I use an LED Lenser (www.ledlenser.com), revolutionary lights. I've to a small one strapped to my belt at all times in the bush (model P7 - 175 lumens). The one I use for light-painting is the P17 (200 lumens but a more focused beam and about the physical size of a large Maglite). There's one above my model, the X21, which outputs 1000 lumens. You have to see this light to believe it. Batteries last very long due to the LED design. 

Originally Posted by
Roger Clark
Many of your stars appear white. Did you use levels to bring the intensity up? If not, what processing?
I did not do anything specific, except add a bit of LCE to the sky as a whole...
...
-
Lifetime Member
Excellent approach and capture. This totally works for me! Thanks for the suggestion about bouncing the light off of your hand.
Cheers, Jay
My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at
http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com
"Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Morkel,
I would say this is my favorite of this type if image so far. I like the well defined silhouette and the illumination level just right for me.
-
BPN Member
Thanks for your kind comments Jay and Robert...