Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Little Bee-eater

  1. #1
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default Little Bee-eater

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This little guy flew straight past us and by the time we hit the anchors he had perched up some distance away. Slowly we back up, but he/she was still a distance away, plus shooting behind, craning to get position is not ideal. This is about a 50% crop, even when using the 500mm lens!!!

    Steve

    Subject: Little Bee-eater with food in beak (Merops pusillus)
    Location: Botswana
    Camera: Canon MKIII
    Lens: 500f/4 - HH
    Exposure: 1/800s at f/5.6 ISO400 0 stop compensation
    Time of day: 9.27am
    Crop: 50% crop (original capture horizontal)
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Africa
    Posts
    3,723
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great to see the catch and I am a big fan of LBE's..Great perch and pose. Unfortunately IQ has not held. There is a lot of noise evident on the bird and im not sure if its from the crop and sharpening or because of trying to lighten the front because the subject being backlit. Also the eye has been overdone and looks artificial. I must attest to the difficulty of trying to capture these guys, very small and very fast. Colors look pretty much spot on.

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is why Dumay I shoot and crop in camera, rarely do I crop more than 10% of the original, so 50% is going to highlight any noise. Re the eye I did chuckle, I quickly change that as it seemed too dark and just nudged it a fraction, so think I will revert to the original. Sadly the MKIV was on the 70-200

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the subject, BG and huge prey item (or is it that these birds are very small!). I agree with Dumay, and there is also an abrupt change in sharpness when comparing the neck and brest to the wing and belly. Tough situation you had here.

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Daniel, good call. I tend to work now at 50% for the MKIV and got into that mode, MKIII I feel needs to be at 100% so you don't miss anything. Cheers, trust this now address both eye and chest, Dumay the eyes is now, as is, but still not great due to crop/noise.

    BTW Crop is slightly bigger compared to the OP.

    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve, I cant believe how large that fly is. Your repost pretty much sorts out the eye and chest area, and agree, you have nailed the colours nicely. They also stand out against the grey BG. Never had the opportunity to shoot a little Bee - Eater yet.

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The repost looks great. It addreses all the issues raised. I love the bug! Very nice BG and I like the curve of the branch,
    Gail

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Steve, the overall sharpening is much better on your repost with natural continuity on the plumage. I do think the eye needs more work though, so I took the liberty of tweaking it. I used the burn tool to darken the pupil, and a combination of sponge tool and selective colour to enhance the red iris. Hope you like!

  9. #9
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cool Daniel, no problem with a re work as it has developed the image in the right way, thanks.

    However, I just wonder if the 'perceived look' is somewhere between the two, but I am most grateful for the input and will have another look at the RAW later, nice to see the old darkroom habits transferred into the modern world of Digital.

    Cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics