Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Large Vermilion Flycatcher (Pileated Woodpecker)

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mission, TX
    Posts
    187
    Threads
    97
    Thank You Posts

    Default Large Vermilion Flycatcher (Pileated Woodpecker)

    I was at Brazos Bend SP in TX yesterday morning taking pictures of Vermilion Flycatchers.
    When this Pileated Woodpecker landed in front of me.
    All C&C welcome

    NIKON D90, 50-500mm lens, fl 500, f 13, 1/250, iso 400, MF, tripod.


    Name:  DSC_1267Pr.jpg
Views: 161
Size:  184.0 KB

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    CM:

    Always fun when you get an unexpected visitor. Exposure looks good except for perhaps a bit overexposed in the red channel. Interesting tree, nice view of his foot.

    The biggest problem for me is that the image quality is pretty soft. I don't know if this represents a big crop or perhaps a focusing error.

    He is also angled away from us a bit.

    Did you have any luck with the flycatchers?

    Cheers

    Randy
    Last edited by Randy Stout; 10-15-2011 at 09:22 AM.
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  3. #3
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely framed and yes to the over-saturated REDs but either this is a huge, huge crop or you did something very wrong with the image optimization. Image quality is poor at best.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Always fun to get an unexpected visitor! Do agree with the others about image quality though.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mission, TX
    Posts
    187
    Threads
    97
    Thank You Posts

    Default Raw file of woodpecker

    Randy, Arthur, & Doug

    Thanks for taking time to comment on my picture. I don't know where it is my eyes or screen, I just don't see all of the things in these pictures.
    In most cases the pictures posted by other look good to me, I don't see the problem till someone bring it up.

    I have upload the raw file of the woodpecker.

    If anyone of you have time to look at it and tell me what I am doing wrong it would be great.

    Thanks in advance

    CM


    http://heavensmyhome.com/Birds/DSC_1267.NEF

  6. #6
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,828
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    CM, It was a huge crop, about impossible to do.
    This is about 50%, not a bad image, but still a bit much of a crop.
    If you can't get closer, try to make them a bit more of a Landscape photo.


    DSC_1267.jpg
    Dan Kearl

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for providing your RAW file. There are a couple of factors hurting your image quality. First of all, as Dan pointed out above, the crop is huge. The bird itself measures only 560 pixels tall. You'll get much better image quality with more pixels on your subject. You used a zoom lens at maximum zoom to get to 500mm; a lot of the folks here opt for prime 500mm lenses which unfortunately cost a lot of money but do pay off with excellent image quality. You were stopped down to f/13 and I suspect that diffraction reduced your image quality. And your shutter speed was pretty slow for a Woodpecker, as they never seem to sit still. I would have traded a bit of aperture for a faster shutter speed. I like what Dan did with the crop; the shot works much better when you include some environment. Keep up the good work!
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics