Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Stonehenge

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Stonehenge

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another from my trip in May with after hours access to the inner circle.

    Canon 7D
    16-35 @ 16 mm
    1/200
    f6.3
    ISO 400
    HH, levels adjustment, LCE and sharpened in CS5, slight crop for comp.

    I've debated a slight warming filter or increase to the WB but left it as shot.

    C&C welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

    Rachel

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A very reflective image of the location Rachel. Might have tried going for a lower POV looking up to give a more dramatic feel, less FG and more sky perhaps?

    Could run either aN ND filter via Gradient adj to darken the sky, or making this in RAW a Smart object and working with two layers to strengthen the sky and give it more depth. Would lighten the stones a tad too, IMHO.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Rachel,

    Warming would be OK but I like it as is. I would work to upgrade the look of the sky using my Multiply adjustment (below).

    THis will make the FG somewhat dark so use a curves correction to lightening. Pin the upper 50% of the curve and then pull up and left at the 1/4 point on the lower 50% of tones and the FG and rocks will brighten right up.


    Highlight selection:

    1) Channels palette.
    2) Ctrl key and click the RGB channel. Photoshop will now create a feathered selection around highlight pixels in the image. Photoshop has selected pixels based on how bright they are. Pure white pixels are selected 100%. Pure black pixels are not selected and pixels falling in-between those two extremes are selected based on a percentage of how close they are to white.

    Blending Mode Adjustment:

    1) Go back to layer palette - you will see selection.
    2) Create BG copy.
    3) Create mask on the BG copy from the selection.
    4) Selection is grayscale shaded.
    5) Change blending mode to Multiply.
    6) Adjust opacity.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel

    I you do add a bit more depth to the sky then l would think about/look at trimming off some of the foreground, maybe to where the worn patch narrows. Would place the horizon approximately on the lower third.

    DON

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Robert, be interested to know your thoughts.

    Over the past year I have found that using Smart objects for the initial building of certain files works very well, especially when it comes to exposure ie like the sky in Rachel's post that needs some strength to it. As you are working directly from the RAW surely the quality, colour, blending etc is better rather than an adjustment/blending layer?

    Would welcome your thoughts.

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Rachel,

    I have not seen this for a long time, the last was in 1970 on my way to the Bath Festival, the UK's equivalent of Woodstock. In those days you could just walk in!

    Brings back fond memories for me

    Remarkable how small it is.

    I would try cropping some from the bottom, otherwise very fine.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Robert, just reflecting on my question, no need for a reply actual.

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Rachel,

    As it is mentioned twice, I would not crop from the bottom as the path acts as a leading line to the rocks.

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks all for the comments and suggestions, much appreciated and I'll play a bit and repost. I prefer the more full version on this one with the path but do have some other images that I prefer as a pano. Thanks Robert for coming back and clarifying your thoughts with respect to the crop too.

    Steve - shot this one while sitting on the ground but didn't think about angling the lens up at the time.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  10. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well the location can side track you a little when you visit and you got special access too, still very impressive for a pile of stones, LOL.

    FYI there was a bad accident there at the weekend, closed the road for several hours.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Repost

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here's a repost following Robert's suggestions with the opacity for the multiply at 40%.

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Robert's recommendations and Rachael's application has created a winner. A wonderful presentation of a pile of rocks.

    BTW, dare I ask how you obtained the after hours access?
    Cheers, Jay

    My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com

    "Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.

  13. #13
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Jay. You can arrange it directly with English Heritage or there are a couple of companies that run "day" trips which include the Inner Circle access which is only done before or after hours.

    Rachel

  14. #14
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, a little late to the party, but quite like the repost. nice work!

  15. #15
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Andrew

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics