Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Black-crowned Night Heron

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default Black-crowned Night Heron

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I came across a group of perhaps 25 Black-crowned Night Herons at Brigantine on a cloudy/rainy day last week - I've never seen so many in one place. I know the IQ here suffers from a bit of noise and 50% crop, but figured I'd share it, as my first opportunity to catch one of these guys in flight. C&C appreciated.

    D7000 | 700mm | 1/2000s | f/7.1 | +0.7 EV

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You got a nice incoming flight pose, and made the most of it. The red eye really pops with an otherwise subdued color palette. Noise is pretty noticeable; what ISO were you using?
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  3. #3
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    You got a nice incoming flight pose, and made the most of it. The red eye really pops with an otherwise subdued color palette. Noise is pretty noticeable; what ISO were you using?
    Oops, forgot to include the ISO. It was 2000. I tried another PP version, with some Topaz Denoise on the bird, which helped the noise but left the breast looking too smoothed out. I might try again just on the near underwing.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Africa
    Posts
    3,723
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not sure if this is a large crop or you lightened in PP but the noise is very visible under the wing and on the body, and the IQ is lacking (very little detail visible)..Comp looks good

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice comp and pose, but too bad the noise is so pronounced. Was the image originally underexposed? Seems +0.7 EC would not be enough with such a white scene (keep in mind I'm used to Canon...)

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love the incoming gliding pose with nice background. Wish you had a better light and the image looks a bit underexpose.

  7. #7
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Cadieux View Post
    Nice comp and pose, but too bad the noise is so pronounced. Was the image originally underexposed? Seems +0.7 EC would not be enough with such a white scene (keep in mind I'm used to Canon...)
    The histogram in ACR showed room at both ends, maybe the result of the dull light. I didn't correct the exposure in ACR, but after conversion I pinched in the Levels sliders on both right and left ends, perhaps having the same effect as adjusting for underexposure?? Here's a repost that gets rid of some of the noise, but doesn't fully resolve the poor IQ.

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Repost is a huge improvement. I really like the incoming angle and clean BG. Well done, Bill!

  9. #9
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Cadieux View Post
    Nice comp and pose, but too bad the noise is so pronounced. Was the image originally underexposed? Seems +0.7 EC would not be enough with such a white scene (keep in mind I'm used to Canon...)
    Hey Dan, I have found that though Nikon in general needs less plus than Canon that many Nikon folks fail to push their exposures far enough to the right in light scene/low light situations... Not sure why.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  10. #10
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,828
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill, A perfect flight angle to me and for iso 2000, the repost works for me. Nice work at both capture and processing.
    Dan Kearl

  11. #11
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for commenting. I appreciate the feedback.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics