Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Quoddy Head State Park, ME (the eastern most point of the continental United States.

  1. #1
    Mike Hannisian
    Guest

    Default Quoddy Head State Park, ME (the eastern most point of the continental United States.

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I captured this image with a Canon 50D camera and a Canon 28-70mm f/2.8 lens at 70mm. My ISO was 100, my aperture was f/4.5, my shutter speed was 1/250, and my EV was 0.0. The camera was hand held. I cropped the image slightly but neither added nor removed anything. The land in the background is Campobello Island, Canada. The reason for the wide aperture was the fact that I did not need added dof as the lens was operating as a modest telephoto at 112mm which allowed me to stand back far enough to achieve the dof I desired.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike - nice scene and I like the composition and colors. I'm not sure how far to the right the middle rocks extended but if it wasn't too far, I would have preferred to include all rather than truncate it. If you had stopped down a bit, I think you would have had better sharpness throughout. There's a halo noticeable along the top of the trees on the lhs.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    Mike Hannisian
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Hollander View Post
    Mike - nice scene and I like the composition and colors. I'm not sure how far to the right the middle rocks extended but if it wasn't too far, I would have preferred to include all rather than truncate it. If you had stopped down a bit, I think you would have had better sharpness throughout. There's a halo noticeable along the top of the trees on the lhs.

    TFS,
    Rachel
    Rachel, Thanks for the comments. The rocks extended to far to include them all. So far as the halo, I will reprocess the image (when I get some time) to eliminate that artifact. Thanks for pointing it out.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike, where was your point of focus since you are happy with an f/stop of 4.5?

    If the subject of the scene is the whole scene, I cannot agree with such a wide open Av as the image is clearly soft in the foreground and background. Did you intend for a significantly soft border?

    The rock in the middle of the scene; does it go for a long ways to the right? Could you have moved to the left so as to provide water on the right side of that middle rock?

    Since there are no clouds high in the sky I would also consider cropping some of the negative blue and making more of a pano.

    Cheers,
    Cheers, Jay

    My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com

    "Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.

  5. #5
    Mike Hannisian
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Gould View Post
    Mike, where was your point of focus since you are happy with an f/stop of 4.5?

    If the subject of the scene is the whole scene, I cannot agree with such a wide open Av as the image is clearly soft in the foreground and background. Did you intend for a significantly soft border?

    The rock in the middle of the scene; does it go for a long ways to the right? Could you have moved to the left so as to provide water on the right side of that middle rock?

    Since there are no clouds high in the sky I would also consider cropping some of the negative blue and making more of a pano.

    Cheers,
    The lighthouse.

  6. #6
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike, agree with the previous comments and suggestions. To me the foreground rocks look rather flat, increasing the contrast will help with that. Even though you handheld the image I think you could have stopped down further for improved sharpness throughout.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike, I agree with the above comments. I wouldn't have shot this lower than F11 and would probably have shot it at F16 or 22. At F4.5 your taking a chance an area will be soft. You made the investment in camera equiptment so I would suggest you get a tripod and ballhead if your planning on doing landscapes. This will enable you to shoot at lower shutter speeds without being concerned about camera shake. I wouldn't go out without one.
    Lighting is everything in photography and this looks like it was shot sometime near mid day. Your best results and most dramatic images will come when you use early or late light.
    I would crop the top a little below your name. Glad to see you avoided the merge between the mid rock and the rear shoreline...

  8. #8
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike. I could not add more than Dave has pointed out. The lighting did you no favours here and the image overall as presented seems very soft...might be due to resizing without sharpening? Sorry if I come across as harsh
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  9. #9
    Mike Hannisian
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks to all for your comments.

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Corning, NY
    Posts
    2,507
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the scene and the mood. On my monitor it looks a bit soft.

  11. #11
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Morkel and Dave summed up my thoughts exactly.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics