Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Could I be any cuter?

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default Could I be any cuter?

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I think this little guy just rocks the cuteness chart! He gives Easter chicks a run for their money
    Canon 7D
    f4 500mm with 1.4X III convertor
    Taken around 6:30 PM September 10, 2011
    SS 12500
    f 6.3
    ISO 400
    cropped by 20% from left and above.
    I used Artie's sharpening technique for the first time (from Digital Basics) with this picture and it works!! Up until now, I have used LR3 sharpening for jpeg for screen at high. I think I will have to revisit all my other shots...sigh
    Comments and critiques are always appreciated and learned from with thanks,
    Gail

  2. #2
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Terrific, Gail. Low angle and eye contact makes it feel like he's in the room with me. Great light and exposure and detail. Sharpening looks good on my screen. And way up there on the cuteness chart.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    central NY
    Posts
    2,414
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The cuteness factor sure is off the charts, Gail. Adorable. Overall a great shot, comp, HA, light and low angle.

  4. #4
    Brendan Dozier
    Guest

    Default

    Super cute, Gail, beautiful detail, color. Love the low angle closeness, pose, eye contact, and the nice texture to the wet sand. I like the blue in BG, but I might try to desaturate some of the blue out of just the the foam part of the water and there is small patch of blue cast on the left side of upper breast. Very nice composition, and I can tell you are really enjoying that 500!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    74
    Threads
    4
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    He is so cute and you can tell he knows it by that look in his eye ;-) Fantastic capture, in my opinion you handled the whites perfectly!!! Gorgeous blue in the bg too.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Posts
    6,275
    Threads
    574
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    10/10 on the cuteness scale and really well photographed as well. Love the fluffy pose.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Gail, Nice sharpness and pose. I like the composition, I may have tried to put the little one a bit more to the right if it were mine. Very adorable and one of the cutest I've seen. Love it!!

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    8,509
    Threads
    827
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A real beauty, Gail.

  9. #9
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a puffed up little guy.
    The feather detail and DOF is really good.
    Maybe just a bit of NR on the background would make this about perfect.
    Dan Kearl

  10. #10
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    This is so nice!! Excellent sharpness, detail, exposure control, shooting angle, eye contact and CUTE...!! If anything maybe slightly less sharpening.

  11. #11
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very cute indeed I agree with Ofer the image is slightly over sharpen and you really need to selectively sharpen the subject only and mask out the BG as posted the BG is showing noise which is caused by being sharpen. If you will post a non sharpen version I will sharpen it to better illustrate the difference.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  12. #12
    Forum Participant christopher galeski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ENGLAND LANCASHIRE
    Posts
    5,106
    Threads
    360
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    very nice image Gail,love every thing about it,but I agree with Don,the BGis noisey,sort that out,and you have one magic image.well done.

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Gail

    This is indeed a beautiful capture. sharp enough for me. sand bar look quite interesting.
    might give a round of NR on the bg Water only ..

    Rest you have done it already

  14. #14
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent love the pose and details, well done!
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  15. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Africa
    Posts
    3,723
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very, very nice...Great exp and light..>Congrats Gail

  16. #16
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for your comments. I will do a repost after work and redo the noise in the BG and move bird slightly to the right,
    Gail

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rotonda West , FL
    Posts
    3,642
    Threads
    198
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Top of the cuteness chart for sure! Love the puffy body, that sweet little face, your nice low angle and the great look at those sweet little feets

  18. #18
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here is the repost with USM on the bird only.I have to say that I don't see much difference myself but perhaps it is my amateur eye
    Gail

  19. #19
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,867
    Threads
    169
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Amazing image, Gail. You've knocked this one out of the park! The repost is killer. I agree with all the positive. This fella is dripping with cuteness :)

  20. #20
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    with all due respect and agree on the chartbuster this image is.

    I've done same which Jim told you about your owl image.

    I have separated background cut the sand bar and given high NR on the water.
    added bit sharpness to sand portion.

    Now as for the bird i think i like the OP processing as it was giving much more detailed look over to the breast white parts.

  21. #21
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mital,
    Thanks for your repost. I am not sure I understand the "cut the sandbar". What does that mean?
    I did brighten the picture by 5 points in my repost so that is why you are seeing the difference in the whites. Good point,
    Gail

  22. #22
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    hey Gail,

    here is the trick,

    I have separated background from bird,
    say about 1" of bottom is the beach sand copying it to new layer from bg.

    Given high NR on bg and added USM to the Sand portion.


  23. #23
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Pachuca, Hidalgo.
    Posts
    267
    Threads
    65
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    great Gail, i love the eye contact the better i see in much time

  24. #24
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Gail, The BG looks better on the repost and even better on Mital version which is what I would have done using a layer mask and applied NR to the BG only. You really do not see a difference try opening both of your versions in PS next to each other.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  25. #25
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    306
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cute image, and love the pose you captured. Nice and fluffed up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics