Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Eastern Meadowlark

  1. #1
    Mike Hannisian
    Guest

    Default Eastern Meadowlark

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I took this image of a stretching Eastern Meadowlark with a Canon 7D with a Canon 600mm f/4.0 lens and a Canon 1.4x III teleconverter. My ISO was 500, aperture was f/5.6, shutter speed was 1/640, and an EV of +0.67. It was shot from my car with the lens resting on the door with the window all the way down. Nothing has been added or removed but was cropped to some extent.

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike:


    This is a very fun pose, morning aerobics for him. I might loosen the framing just a bit on the left and top, he looks a bit crowded.

    To my eye, the sharpest part of the image is that foot. Not sure where the camera focus point was, but the head looks a bit soft. Possibly some slight motion blur as well, but uncertain.

    Hope you got some more of this fellow!

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    761
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with Randy's comments. Give him a bit more room behind him if you can. I like the wing stretch giving you a bit more of his feather pattern than you might see in just a standing pose. TFS

  4. #4
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas.
    Posts
    6,260
    Threads
    426
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike, yes to a more loose crop. pose is excellent...and good job getting parallel. I think you were working with too thin DOF range. Looks like you were quite close.....stopping down would have covered the bird better. I'd have increased the ISO to be able to achieve that.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    506
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great shot, but I think I would like more room in the back and the at the top. I think if you give the bird a bit more space (in other word, the bird is a bit smaller in the frame), the slight motion blur is not as noticeable, IMO. The room in front of the bird looks fine to me. As Randy mentioned above, the focus is off, and it looks like it's more toward the wing tip and the right foot area.

    Raymond

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics