Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Tatoosh and Paintbrush.

  1. #1
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,828
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default Tatoosh and Paintbrush.

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just spent a few days on Mt. Rainier in Washington state.
    Have a lot of images to process, but I liked this one which is the Mountain
    Range to the south of Rainier, The Tatoosh.
    The Wildflower season was in peak in mid-September!
    Taken at Paradise lodge after sunset.

    .4 sec.
    f22
    25mm (nikon 18-105mm on D7000)
    ISO400
    Saved at 46 quality.

    DSC_1357nx.jpg
    Dan Kearl

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dan - I like the glow on the distant mountains and how you used the break in the trees as a leading line. Nicely seen and captured.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Smithville,Tx
    Posts
    400
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful scene and nice alpenglow. The paintbrush don't seem to be quite sharp. Maybe a little movement? I'd be tempted to try cropping a little from the left, you've got some branches poking into the frame and it would move the mountain out of dead center.

  4. #4
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Dan,

    I can't say this is working for me.

    I believe an image like this needs acceptable sharpness near to far and even at f/22 you are not getting it. Many times you have to employ alternate methods (image focus stacking) or equipment (tilt-shift lens or view camera) to get it.

    The light is just not working here. The trees are in deep shadow.

    Compositionally, I feel the FG flower clipping hurts the image. IMO it is best to get a clean cut on the stalk - yes I now it is tough to find that one scene that works in. Also the farthest peak is intersected by a tree. I would have moved the camera right a tad to give that peak a clear view.

  5. #5
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,828
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the comments.
    Robert, I appreciate the honesty, that is why I come here.
    I agree with your critique also. I knew it had potential which is why I used f22 as
    my goal was to get it all sharp, but I had to set up too close, there was just some gravel in front of the wildflowers I did not want
    in the foreground.
    The trees were always blocking one peak or another where ever I moved.
    The Western skies are also really hazy from all the wildfires, so I used iso400 to get some
    blue in the sky instead of a total washout from a slow SS at f22.
    I eventually used a flash fill for some shots to "freeze" the flowers but they didn't work out.
    Good observations.
    Dan Kearl

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Going wider and using HDR capture was the way to go. Good that you are open to Robert's comments as they are right on.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics