Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Eastern Meadowlark

  1. #1
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default Eastern Meadowlark

    Took this earlier this year. Not sure how I feel about it. I think it might benefit from less space overall, or maybe landscape layout.
    I'm also not sure about the setting. It's a mowed field. I'm not sure if it's "natural" enough, but it is where they were nesting....I'm kind of weird about that as I tend to refuse to take pics of birds that aren't "wild" and in their natural settings..I need to get over that as I've passed up some nice opportunities.

    I've done very little post, could probably stand some sharpening and noise reduction...I'm still not sure it's a "keeper".

    So, what would you do with it?




    D3/Sigma 300-800 @ 800mm, f/5.6, ISO 800, 1/1000, P(?!), Spot, Dynamic 51pt, +0, No flash, Handheld, Distance about 100ft

  2. #2
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Steven,
    I like the pose and the environs....but yep....a bit of NR on the BG will help. I would also tweak the brighness down a few points....to get the grass/straw a little less bright. I don't know if you are Ok with such things....but the blades of grass sticking up...aminly the one coming out the back and in front of the bird.....would get evicted. I would then finesse some of the other blades and the whish orbs in the 9 o'clock area. If not ok with such things.....then just toning down the brightness and running some more NR on the BG would still make this a keeper in my book!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Posts
    6,275
    Threads
    574
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve, I'm confused. If a mowed field is where they nest, why is that not natural enough for you? I think it's really a lovely image of this beautiful bird and with the tweaks suggested by Roman, plus maybe a re-visit of the crop, it would absolutely be a keeper in my book.

  4. #4
    BPN Member jack williamson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    south mississippi
    Posts
    1,979
    Threads
    107
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steven I would keep it. The bird will probably look excellent with some sharpening (it looks good now)

    I think a different crop would work, some off the bottom for sure. That looks to be an unusual amount

    of noise for a D3 at iso 800.

  5. #5
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roman Kurywczak View Post
    Hey Steven,
    I like the pose and the environs....but yep....a bit of NR on the BG will help. I would also tweak the brighness down a few points....to get the grass/straw a little less bright. I don't know if you are Ok with such things....but the blades of grass sticking up...aminly the one coming out the back and in front of the bird.....would get evicted. I would then finesse some of the other blades and the whish orbs in the 9 o'clock area. If not ok with such things.....then just toning down the brightness and running some more NR on the BG would still make this a keeper in my book!
    I have no problem with heavy editing....
    I have low morals.

  6. #6
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grace Scalzo View Post
    Steve, I'm confused. If a mowed field is where they nest, why is that not natural enough for you? I think it's really a lovely image of this beautiful bird and with the tweaks suggested by Roman, plus maybe a re-visit of the crop, it would absolutely be a keeper in my book.
    Well, it's because they also populate wild plains type areas, pastures, etc.. (but you'll never get one posing on the ground)
    We have Yellow crowned Night Herons which nest in a neighborhood not too far away....seems a little too "easy", they are more used to people etc. (But I have taken their pictures.
    Like I said, I need to get over that.

  7. #7
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jack williamson View Post
    Steven I would keep it. The bird will probably look excellent with some sharpening (it looks good now)

    I think a different crop would work, some off the bottom for sure. That looks to be an unusual amount

    of noise for a D3 at iso 800.
    Thanks, it does seem like a lot of noise. Possible the LR "export to Flickr" auto sharpening/resize caused it.

  8. #8
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Heck, I have made a living looking for and photographing birds that like people; you need a check-up from the neck up :).

    I like the image; Especially the bird. Lots of crops would work as would a bit of image clean-up.

    The yellow looks a bit over-SAT.... And detail-less. See several threads in the ER dealing with hot bright yellows and reds, or try adding a Blue Photo Filter at about 15%.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  9. #9
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Ok, here's an edit.

    Crop, Cloning in BG, Light gaussian blur in BG, Cloning straws in tail, High pass sharpening, desaturated and increased luminance slightly in Yellows,Catchlight enhancement, levels set w/ white set to 243.

    Issues: Not 100% fond of cloning in BG. Looks like I created a little color banding in the BG and not sure why (no resizing). Can't tell if it's sharp enough or oversharp (man my eye's are starting to be a problem).
    Can be viewed larger on Flickr.


    Eastern Meadowlark by skersting66, on Flickr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics