Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The 3 Mccaws

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default The 3 Mccaws

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I took this at an australian zoo during a flight demo. I was amazed that i got all three in relatively good focus. Should i drop in a better sky? How does vignette look?
    Nikon D-300
    200-400 Hand held
    1/1000 sec at f 5.6
    ISO 400

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bob. Good job getting all 3 birds in focus with good eye contact and nice wing position. Can't say I'm a big fan of the vignette. I would move the birds slightly to the right in the frame. And I'd also warm up the color temperature a little; things are looking a little blue as presented.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  3. #3
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice job indeed Bob! That's an excellent example of getting the most out of a shallow DOF. Very colorful and I love the dorsal flight view times three! Good suggestions by Doug to make it even stronger. High five for sure.
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Bob- It's great when this happens! But it's rare (head angles and all in focus that is). Depending on your focal length and distance to subject you could have had a decent depth of field. I did some sleuthing of the image with Bridge and found out your focal length was 350mm and your subject distance was 98ft (29.9m). I went to one of many DoF calculators on the net:

    http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

    and the results are shown here. You had a little over 5ft (1.6m) of DoF in this situation, which is not much at about 100ft.

    DoF increases exponentially with distance to subject and linearly with f-number.

  5. #5
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks John! I didn't realize the birds were that far away.
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bob,

    They appear to close in the frame and they were - nice data John.
    Agree with Doug regarding backing down the blue by warming or desaturating. Great job framing all three - well done.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 07-17-2011 at 12:42 PM.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John...thanks for the dof calculations. I immediately checked my metadata and found the following subject distance was 29.90 m or 89.70ft
    focal length was 350 mm.
    I feel even luckier!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics