Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: I'm stalking you!

  1. #1
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default I'm stalking you!

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another Darner dragonfly nymph (Aeshna spp.) photographed in my 2 gallon aquarium. For an insect, these guys have a lot of personality. I like the way they can turn their bodies to orient toward a potential prey item - which sometimes seems to be me! 5D II, 100 mm macro, 1/200, f/16, ISO 400, MT-24EX macro twin flash (diffused), tripod, cable release. I removed a lot of tiny bits of debris from the water, toned down the brighter sand grains, and ran NR on the background. All comments are welcome and appreciated.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,991
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent compsition Steve! The curved body nicely fills the frame and focus and sharpness are spot on. I might be inclined to brighten up the image a bit. Esp. the left part of the head is a bit dark. I must add to that that my work monitor isn't the best available....

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Another engaging composition. I agree with Jerry on the lightening...........Nice DOF, really puts his head right in your face Nicely done..........Also love the texture of pebbles.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks for the comments Jerry and Jay. Here is a repost which is a little brighter and I also lightened the left side of the head just a bit.

  5. #5
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,015
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent shot Steve, my only criticism is the sand, is it necessary? / Are these creatures always on a sandy floor?
    The question is of course what is an alternative, I wonder how it would look if you painted some paper or used a photograph of some soil or something like that and placed it under the aquarium and dispensed with the sand - what do you think?

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cool repost, it highlights the almost translucent quality of the head. Love it!

  7. #7
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Ashton View Post
    Excellent shot Steve, my only criticism is the sand, is it necessary? / Are these creatures always on a sandy floor?
    The question is of course what is an alternative, I wonder how it would look if you painted some paper or used a photograph of some soil or something like that and placed it under the aquarium and dispensed with the sand - what do you think?
    Thanks for your comment Jonathan. In the ponds where these nymphs are found they are not always (or probably not even often) on a clean sandy substrate like this. They would typically be found lurking amongst the aquatic vegetation or on a bottom covered with decaying leaves, stems, etc. I have to admit that sand isn't my favorite substrate for photos. I hadn't thought about your idea to use a photo under the aquarium - I'm guessing that it would be pretty easy to tell that the nymph was standing on a glass surface rather than on a real substrate. At some point, I may have to scoop out some of the decaying material from the bottom of a pond and try that in my aquarium.

  8. #8
    BPN Member Paul Lagasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bells Corners, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,316
    Threads
    642
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice capture, before reading I wondered how you got this image....repost rocks...I gotta try this, I have an old aquarium around here somewhere. Kinda think the sand is ok.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant OvidiuCavasdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,054
    Threads
    237
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent pose, composition and details on the head. Repost is even better.

  10. #10
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Steve,
    The snad doesn't bother me.....although the decaying leaves may be cool! The repost adresses my recommendations......as usual.....super job!

  11. #11
    Brendan Dozier
    Guest

    Default

    This is awesome, Steve! Repost looks great, its head looks like it is going to pop right out of the frame!

  12. #12
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for your comments!

  13. #13
    Forum Participant christopher galeski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ENGLAND LANCASHIRE
    Posts
    5,106
    Threads
    360
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    very nice Steve,repost better,and I dont mind the sand.thanks.

  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,991
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Steve, repost works great, the light on the head is much more balanced. I would add a little contrast, though. Adding decaying material as a substrate might look more natural, but will probably triple your time cloning the floating debris out! You might try some black or dark grey sand instead. But as you say, many ponds where these critters lurk have sandy bottoms.

  15. #15
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry van Dijk View Post
    Adding decaying material as a substrate might look more natural, but will probably triple your time cloning the floating debris out!
    You're probably right Jerry. I already spend 2-3 hours just cleaning up many of these images that I've taken using "clean" water and "clean" substrate. It becomes very tedious!!

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,991
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Maxson View Post
    You're probably right Jerry. I already spend 2-3 hours just cleaning up many of these images that I've taken using "clean" water and "clean" substrate. It becomes very tedious!!
    Hi Steve, I would be very curious to see an image which hasn't been cleaned up for us to judge if it is all worth your effort. I bet that when you take an image like this with an underwater camera in the field that the water wouldn't be clean either.

    Check out these galleries of one of Hollands best nature photographers
    http://www.rubensmit.nl/en_gallery.php?galleryId=11

    and of one of our Hollands best underwater photographers, who makes images like yours in natural habitat (check out the water beetle larvae eating a tadpole!)
    http://www.kolvoortonderwaterfoto.nl...rwater_insects

  17. #17
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry van Dijk View Post
    Hi Steve, I would be very curious to see an image which hasn't been cleaned up for us to judge if it is all worth your effort. I bet that when you take an image like this with an underwater camera in the field that the water wouldn't be clean either.

    Check out these galleries of one of Hollands best nature photographers
    http://www.rubensmit.nl/en_gallery.php?galleryId=11

    and of one of our Hollands best underwater photographers, who makes images like yours in natural habitat (check out the water beetle larvae eating a tadpole!)
    http://www.kolvoortonderwaterfoto.nl...rwater_insects
    Hi Jerry. Thanks for sending these links.Trying to photograph these invertebrates in the field raises the degree of difficulty enormously! I agree that the water wouldn't be clean - and that's pretty evident in the images these photographers are creating. In the shallow ponds where I collect my subjects, just stepping into the water raises big clouds of debris. I've tried a little (very little) underwater landscape photography in shallow areas of the lake in front of my house and just being in the water and slowly moving around stirs up a lot of debris - in addition to all the small items that are already suspended in the water column.
    The next time I post an image, I'll include a couple "before cleanup" versions so folks can see what I'm dealing with. To some extent, how much to clean up an image like this is a matter of personal taste and style.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics