Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: fish...out

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    1,143
    Threads
    326
    Thank You Posts

    Default fish...out

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon Mark IV
    300 f.2,8
    f 5
    1/2500
    iso 800

  2. #2
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Excellent shot!! Cropping about a third of the distance between the back of the bird and the top would make it even stronger IMHO.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Africa
    Posts
    3,723
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Oh, he just missed...Lovely wing position, I like Ofer's idea on taking some off the top. Lovely stuff Giovanni!

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    1,143
    Threads
    326
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ok but if I take some off the top for make a regular shoot (31x20) I must reduce also the splash of the fish or the space in front of the eagle.
    What you think about ?

  5. #5
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Although I am a 2:3 freak I do admit that not every image can fit into this framing. I have no problem with a panorama crop. However, if I get a photo that needs to be cropped as a square I just put it in the bin as sad as it is...(a mental issue - I know...)
    Your original image is fine but I just think that a pano works a bit better - nothing major...

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    50
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great job capturing this one.. I would like to see more on the right side, I find the top needs to stay in order to give room for the "splash" that is traveling upward.

    Chad

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,522
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I prefer Ofer's crop, it focuses on the bird more.
    It would take it up another notch if the left wing is a bit higher..

  8. #8
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good timing again. Bird flying away is less than ideal. May we assume that the birds in this series are baited?
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  9. #9
    Forum Participant christopher galeski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ENGLAND LANCASHIRE
    Posts
    5,106
    Threads
    360
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    very nice Geovanni,agree with troy about left wing being higher,but still a very nice action shot,and different,meaning, the eagle missing the fish.thanks.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    1,143
    Threads
    326
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    Good timing again. Bird flying away is less than ideal. May we assume that the birds in this series are baited?
    The situation in natural in Norwey with the famous Ole Martin.
    There are fishs sent from the boat and fish living in the sea (both situation mixed)
    I think t could be as the bald eagle in Alaska

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics