Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Chestnut-sided Warbler

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    59
    Threads
    12
    Thank You Posts

    Default Chestnut-sided Warbler

    Hi All,

    Been a while since I have posted anything (mainly because I've tried to spend more time shooting and applying some of the lessons I've learned here!)

    This is a photo I took l yesterday, attempting to utilize fill flash on a very overcast day.
    Name:  large.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  109.0 KB

    Info:
    Camera: 1D Mk III
    Flash: 430 EX II
    Exposure time: 1/300th (high speed sync, I think set to ETTL -1?) on a monopod.
    Aperature: f10 (yep, didn't check my settings, just fired away when the bird alit close to me!)
    Focal Length: 400mm on a 100-400 f5.6L
    ISO: 400
    Exposure bias: -1/3
    Metering: Matrix
    Exposure Program: Aperture Priority

    Converted from RAW using ACR, some noise reduction using Neat Image, cropped and some sharpening in PS CS3.

    Am I supplying way too much info here?

    Cheers,
    Christopher
    Last edited by Christopher Ciccone; 05-23-2011 at 10:58 AM. Reason: Adding some forgotten info

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Perth ON Canada
    Posts
    226
    Threads
    32
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Definitely not too much info Christopher.
    I know very well from recent personal experience how difficult these flighty little warblers are to photograph. The Chestnut-sided is very attractive bird.

    You've done a good job of capturing him in his natural environment. If the image can handle it, I would try a tighter crop taking a fair bit off the left and some off the bottom. Looks like the bird could be brightened slightly. Although I am aware of the benefits using a flash in tough lighting situations, I am not a fan of the small pin-hole catchlight that the flash provides. I would attempt to replace it with a photoshop construct catchlight.

    Joe

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Southeastern Idaho, USA
    Posts
    1,379
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A beautiful subject. We rarely get these guys out west. The whites have been handled nicely. I agree with Joe that a tighter crop, primarily from the left and bottom, would be helpful. Try lightly dodging the lore-eye area and see if some more definition can be obtained in this area. My eye is drawn to a bright spot in the bg to the right of the bird.

    Gary

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    59
    Threads
    12
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks guys!
    I am looking forward to spending a little more time with this file this evening & incorporating your suggestions.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    29
    Threads
    4
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Have you thought about a vertical crop on this one Christopher? It's a nice shot in it's natural setting. The catchlight needs some attention, IMO. I think you could brighten it just a tad also.

    Gary

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    761
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Christopher, very well done. I would prefer a tighter crop, but not too much as I like the blossoms.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts
    130
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice image, Christopher! I'd prefer the Warbler a bit lighter. Tighten the crop a bit, perhaps, but I, too, like the blossoms. These fellows are hard to get in an ideal setting!

  8. #8
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Christopher, this is a lovely little bird! Nice capture and setting, I like the included environment. I might only add that I would lose the OOF stick in the upper left corner by cropping a little from the top and the left. To my eye (just looking at my browser window and moving it around) this makes a very pleasing crop and solves a problem at the same time. Nice job!
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    644
    Threads
    85
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would agree with Kerry and others, I like the habitat around the bird, contrast really well with his bright colors. Interested to see your repost with the eye work, I still get way too many with steel eye when I use fill flash as I'm trying to learn the best techniques myself and would like to see how you cleaned his up.
    Beautiful bird and you did some thing right to get this close, good job and nothing wrong with F10 with that kind of background.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Christopher- Nicely done. I too like the inclusion of the habitat. Agree that a recrop to remove the OOF branch UL would be an improvement. Your flash use is really good here because you can't tell you've used flash- that's the key IMO. On my calibrated monitor I would like to see the image brightened a bit (e.g., Levels in Photoshop), or selective dodging of the face/eye area to brighten that up and get more detail into the eye.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    59
    Threads
    12
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi all,
    Here is a slightly reworked version where I have tightened the crop to remove the OOF in the upper left, tried a bit of patchwork to the bight area to the right, dodging around the eye a bit, and enlarging the catchlight a bit. A vertical crop was a suggested, which I do usually like, but I rather like showing the blossoms a bit more, and am a bit happier with the landscape crop myself.

    Thanks everyone for the kind compliments and for all the great suggestions! I love having a forum where people are keen to help out folks like me improve!

    I guess my biggest concern is... did I overdo it a bit?
    Name:  CSWA-reworked.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  173.7 KB
    Last edited by Christopher Ciccone; 05-25-2011 at 10:26 PM. Reason: Forgot to thank everyone!

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Southeastern Idaho, USA
    Posts
    1,379
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well done Christopher. The only other suggestion would be blurring the vertical line in the left upper quad of the bg, creating a transition from dark to light.

    Gary

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    59
    Threads
    12
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Gary! Now that you mention it, I see that a softer transition/blend there would definietly make it a more pleasing image.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics