Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: chestnut-backed chickadee

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    236
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default chestnut-backed chickadee

    Got a "clean" pose among some willow trees, in early-morning low light and heavy shadow. Removed extraneous branches via large crop initially, then one last very OOF vertical branch in PS5 for a "clean" BG.

    50D + 500L f4.5 + non-reporting 1.4x, on tripod & Wimberley II. ISO 1250, f5.6, 1/250.


    Name:  chestnut-backed chickadee.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  158.6 KB

  2. #2
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allen, great job on the capture here and excellent eye to see the gorgeous background. Good for you for cranking up the ISO when you needed to, especially bold on the 50D (I have one!). Excellent pose, sharpness, head angle and good eye. I might take a little from the top, but let's see what others think about that. There are some shadowy artifacts above your signature that I would probably evict. Good one and well seen!
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Allen, I don't know why but when I opened this up I immediately thought there was a color cast to the image so I put it through the Nik Software filter "correct color cast" and this is what it brought up. Seems a bit closer to what I'm used to seeing in these birds.

    Lovely pose...nice eye contact and, yes, I'd also take some off the top and right side of the frame. Try using the ROT's guidelines as a crop and see what that brings up.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    236
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Julie: What would cause the color cast, if I didn't change color temp from "as shot" - which was set to "cloudy", and this was captured in shadows?

    And I could have sworn I had paid attention to the ROT grid when I originally cropped, but I see now that I did need to take some more off the top and the right.

    Kerry: I find my 50D is fairly forgiving at higher ISOs, as long as I don't have huge contrast differences in the image, and I expose to the right.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northeast Pennsylvania
    Posts
    210
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I see too much space above the bird and not enough at the bottom. I probably would have moved the crop only down to raise the bird in the frame. The space in front of the bird, to me, is pleasing.

    BG looks too clean(plain), no texture.

    I have the same experience with the 50D, expose to the right is right, of course without blowing out the highlights.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    236
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Goldman View Post

    BG looks too clean(plain), no texture.
    This may be the first time I've ever seen that critique here at BPN since I've joined the forum.

    I didn't do anything to the BG but remove OOF branches via cropping and clone tool. Should I replace with a "busier" BG?? Add noise??

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northeast Pennsylvania
    Posts
    210
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    No, do not add noise or anything else.
    I had made this same comment, "BG looks too clean", to a friend photographer and he came back with, "sure, that's a green blanket I had put up as a BG".
    My comment, "BG looks too clean......" should have added, "too me". If that's the BG you got from the scene, and you like it, then, leave it the way it is.

  8. #8
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Allen, any changes you make in pp can affect the colors as can the fact that what WB you shot at might have been just a tiny bit off in color in the first place. Just because we choose "shady" on a shady day doesn't mean it automatically makes our colors perfect - just closer to what they should be. Looking at the breast area of your bird I thought it felt a bit on the blue side so I rebalanced from that standpoint to bring that area closer to a truer gray. Again - it's subjective - but after looking at over 10,000 images here on BPN it rather jumps out at me this point.

    Don't worry about the BG - "clean" is what most often works. It's certainly okay to leave a few branches for a more "environmental-type" image but when the bird is the subject and you have a fairly clear shot I say go for it and clean up the stragglers as you have done here. From a selling standpoint a clean BG will be more sought out.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northeast Pennsylvania
    Posts
    210
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julie Kenward View Post
    Don't worry about the BG - "clean" is what most often works. It's certainly okay to leave a few branches for a more "environmental-type" image but when the bird is the subject and you have a fairly clear shot I say go for it and clean up the stragglers as you have done here. From a selling standpoint a clean BG will be more sought out.
    I agree, "clean" is better. Maybe I didn't express myself correctly. I could have used "stark" rather than "too clean". This critiquing stuff is hard!! If you look at my "Just another chipping sparrow", I have a "clean" BG yet it has what I have to call shadowy and lighter areas that, for me, add some character to the image.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics