Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Tree Swallow In Flight

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default Tree Swallow In Flight

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nikon D7000 w/Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 vrII lens @ 300mm, hand held
    ISO Equivalent 800; f/7.1, 1/1,600 sec.
    Matrix Metering +0.67
    PP: Topaz DeNoise 4; PS CS5 cropping, levels and curves

    Working these little speed demons in flight is excellent practice that everyone should try. But thank goodness the many duds waste electrons, and not film!

    All C&C are welcome.

    Norm

  2. #2
    BPN Member Tony Whitehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,972
    Threads
    142
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Great result, Norm. These little speedsters are a real challenge. Light gear as you used here is a good choice.
    Tony Whitehead
    Visit my blog at WildLight Photography for latest news and images.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent, this is a really tough bird to get in flight...might sharpen the head a bit more. well done
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Pieter de Waal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Swaziland, Southern Africa
    Posts
    1,677
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great image Norm, very sharp at that SS. Good detail in the whites and love the feather detail in the tail and birds right wing.

  5. #5
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Norm:

    Excellent pose, like the green BG, exposure.
    Just a little soft on the head.

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  6. #6
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nice pose captured. A bit soft as shutter speed is a bit low for this action IMO. Would aslo move the bird a bit more to the right and up. Here is a repost with the correct colour space - sRGB so you can see the colour of the sky is different to how it looks in your original.
    Cheers,
    Ofer

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Stoney Point, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6,868
    Threads
    512
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I liked the fanned tail feathers and complimentary BG. I agree with the suggestions of sharpening the head. Well done Norm!

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not an easy character to capture in flight, so well done here. I like the flight angle and wing spread, and well placed in the frame.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ofer Levy View Post
    Nice pose captured. A bit soft as shutter speed is a bit low for this action IMO. Would aslo move the bird a bit more to the right and up. Here is a repost with the correct colour space - sRGB so you can see the colour of the sky is different to how it looks in your original.
    Cheers,
    Ofer
    Thanks Ofer; I really appreciate your concern for the proper color space. However you may rest assured that I always post sRGB images.

    I can say that, because on the "Save for Web and Devices" screen provided by my Photoshop CS5 software there is a checkbox labeled "Convert to sRGB." That box is always checked on my computer, and thus conversion to sRGB always occurs automatically for images that I post.

    But you are right that conversion to sRGB for web posting (or projector use) is important, and if your software won't do it automatically, you must do it manually.

    In view of what I've said above, I'm not certain how you purport to have done yet another sRGB conversion and somehow gotten a different result with my image. :2
    Anyway, thanks again for your comments.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for your comments! If I print this image or send it on the internet again I will make sure that the bird's head is properly sharpened!

    Norm

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A challenging subject nicely captured! Agree about the additional sharpening. FYI your original image was saved in Adobe RGB and Ofer's repost was saved in sRGB; that said, I can't see any color differences between the two images.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  12. #12
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Converting to Srgb is not enough to ensure correct color display in web browsers.....You also need to include the Srgb tag in the Exif header. To do this in the CS5 "save for web" (and save as) dialogue there is a little checkbox to "embed color profile".

    Most of the browsers handle "unknown" color space differently, even if it is actually Srgb.

    BTW, excellent capture!

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Kersting View Post
    Converting to Srgb is not enough to ensure correct color display in web browsers.....You also need to include the Srgb tag in the Exif header. To do this in the CS5 "save for web" (and save as) dialogue there is a little checkbox to "embed color profile".

    Most of the browsers handle "unknown" color space differently, even if it is actually Srgb.

    BTW, excellent capture!
    Thanks Steve, but now I'm totally confused. I didn't check the "embed color profile" box. But I've opened my posted image in PS CS5 and selected Edit > Convert To Profile. And the resulting screen indicates that my Source Space Profile is the expected sRGB IEC61966-2.1.

    So despite my not having checked the "embed color profile" box, I can't see a problem! Anyway, I will check that box in the future, to see whether it makes a difference in how others perceive my image.
    Last edited by Norm Dulak; 04-19-2011 at 05:05 AM.

  14. #14
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Here's what my computer shows when I open your posted image:

    Name:  screen-capture-1.jpg
Views: 91
Size:  165.3 KB

    Not exactly sure why there's a discrepancy. Anyone have any ideas?
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  15. #15
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    That's the issue w/ web browsers...You won't usually see it w/ PS or another image editing program.
    Different web browsers have different "default behaviors" (some can be changed) as well as different OS's when dealing w/ "unknown" color space. Many default to assigning Srgb, some will assign Adobe Rgb, some will assign monitor colorspace.

    Additionally, your editing program will assign a "default" colorspace upon opening an "unknown". I work in ProPhoto usually and unknowns are opened w/ that. (set in "edit>color settings")

    If you use ACR to open the file initially it will assign a "new color profile" in it's process (settings to be assigned can be seen at bottom of ACR window) so you could open anything and it would show Srgb as the color space once in PS.

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Kersting View Post
    That's the issue w/ web browsers...You won't usually see it w/ PS or another image editing program.
    Different web browsers have different "default behaviors" (some can be changed) as well as different OS's when dealing w/ "unknown" color space. Many default to assigning Srgb, some will assign Adobe Rgb, some will assign monitor colorspace.

    Additionally, your editing program will assign a "default" colorspace upon opening an "unknown". I work in ProPhoto usually and unknowns are opened w/ that. (set in "edit>color settings")

    If you use ACR to open the file initially it will assign a "new color profile" in it's process (settings to be assigned can be seen at bottom of ACR window) so you could open anything and it would show Srgb as the color space once in PS.
    Steve.

    That explains why the image that I converted to the sRGB color space, uploaded to BPN, and later confirmed with my v 5.0.5 Safari browser was still in the sRGB color space, was evaluated by Ofer and Doug as being instead in the RGB color space.

    Now, the question is what can be done about it? Or does it really matter?

    Norm
    Last edited by Norm Dulak; 04-19-2011 at 02:20 PM.

  17. #17
    BPN Member Tony Whitehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,972
    Threads
    142
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    The way I deal with this is to convert the image to sRGB (Edit/Convert to profile), resize and then Save as jpg with a compression to achieve the size limit required. This image has no colour space tagged (File/File info/Camera data) so is being assigned the workspace default of the Photoshop it is being opened in (Adobe RGB in Ofer and Doug's case).
    Tony Whitehead
    Visit my blog at WildLight Photography for latest news and images.

  18. #18
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Norm Dulak View Post
    Steve.

    That explains why the image that I converted to the sRGB color space, uploaded to BPN, and later confirmed with my v 5.0.5 Safari browser was still in the sRGB color space, was evaluated by Ofer and Doug as being instead in the RGB color space.

    Now, the question is what can be done about it? Or does it really matter?

    Norm
    In PS save dialogues there is a checkbox for "embed color space"..check that and problem solved. Every browser and program will open it with the embedded color space (but ACR might still want to change it if not careful)

    BTW, I think it matters. You'll never have full control of how others see your work on the web, but why give up the control you do have...especially if asking for critique.
    Last edited by Steven Kersting; 04-19-2011 at 03:52 PM.

  19. #19
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Whitehead View Post
    The way I deal with this is to convert the image to sRGB (Edit/Convert to profile), resize and then Save as jpg with a compression to achieve the size limit required. This image has no colour space tagged (File/File info/Camera data) so is being assigned the workspace default of the Photoshop it is being opened in (Adobe RGB in Ofer and Doug's case).
    Thanks Tony. That's essentially what I've done, but using the Save for Web and Devises feature of CS5. All of the things you've mentioned are set in that way, since I haven't checked the Embed Color Space box. But based upon what Steve has said, checking that box may be a better idea!!

    In that way, the default characteristics of various browsers should be irrelevant.

    Norm
    Last edited by Norm Dulak; 04-19-2011 at 03:56 PM.

  20. #20
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the explanation. I always check the Embed Color Space option in the Save for Web dialog.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  21. #21
    Steven Kersting
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Norm Dulak View Post
    Thanks Tony. That's essentially what I've done, but using the Save for Web and Devises feature of CS5. All of the things you've mentioned are set in that way, since I haven't checked the Embed Color Space box. But based upon what Steve has said, checking that box may be a better idea!!

    In that way, the default characteristics of various browsers should be irrelevant.

    Norm
    Not "a better idea", but rather "the last step"....You still have to set the file's color space to Srgb (most browsers won't handle Adobe/Pro photo/ etc)

    I probably see these issues much more than most since I tend to use color managed browsers (Firefox, Safari)...If you use IE, everything is Srgb all the time...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics