Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Widgeon

  1. #1
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default Widgeon

    Background to distracting? I kind of like it, it's different but curious on your guy's opinions.

    Camera Maker: Canon
    Camera Model: Canon EOS 40D
    Lens: EF75-300mm f/4-5.6
    Image Date: 2011-03-27 1125 -0700
    Focal Length: 300.0mm
    Aperture: f/5.6
    Exposure Time: 0.0006 s (1/1600)
    ISO equiv: 640
    Exposure Bias: +0.33 EV
    Photographer: Cody Covey




    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice photo Cody. Lots of details and clean BG. The whites on forehead though looks blown out.

  3. #3
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default

    See I thought it looked that way also but Histogram doesn't think so. Can histogram be wrong?

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Cody. Tried looking at the histogram of your photo and it looks properly exposed. I guess, the problem is with my eyes or my monitor.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    236
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the water drop on his bill, and don't mind the BG. But a lower angle would better show off this duck and reduce the amount of water BG.

    Oh - it's "wigeon" - no "D".

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dryden, Ontario
    Posts
    450
    Threads
    81
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cody - although a lower perspective would make a very pleasing background, I am totally OK with the background shown. It looks like you have relatively flat light / overcast conditions which is probably why you aren't seeing a lot of shadow or highlight detail in the plumage. About the easiest way in these lighting conditions to add a bit more contrast to the plumage / make the feather detail come out is the use of fill flash - perhaps something to add to your "bag of tricks" in the future. The focus of most shots is the eye - in this case, the eye of the Wigeon is somewhat obscured in shadow and not as pronounced as I would have hoped. I might suggest a bit of dodging in the shadowed area around the eye to bring it up closer to the plumage of the rest of the head and then selectively adjusting the contrast of the eye itself so that the reflection in the eye is a little more pronounced - I think this will really help to bring the viewer's focus back to the eye.

  7. #7
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Dyck View Post
    Cody - although a lower perspective would make a very pleasing background, I am totally OK with the background shown. It looks like you have relatively flat light / overcast conditions which is probably why you aren't seeing a lot of shadow or highlight detail in the plumage. About the easiest way in these lighting conditions to add a bit more contrast to the plumage / make the feather detail come out is the use of fill flash - perhaps something to add to your "bag of tricks" in the future. The focus of most shots is the eye - in this case, the eye of the Wigeon is somewhat obscured in shadow and not as pronounced as I would have hoped. I might suggest a bit of dodging in the shadowed area around the eye to bring it up closer to the plumage of the rest of the head and then selectively adjusting the contrast of the eye itself so that the reflection in the eye is a little more pronounced - I think this will really help to bring the viewer's focus back to the eye.
    Yeah I tried to do a curves adjustment to bring out some detail in the shadows but I couldn't get the eye to come out without creating tons of noise in the rest of the photo. I will try and do some dodging and see how that helps (never used that tool, so this should be interesting!) It was just a horrible day to be out. No light at all really. When I left my house the sun looked like it was going to at least come out a bit but by the time I got down there it was back to completely overcast haha :)

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I love the water Cody- very "dreamy" in the BG and nice, well-defined ripples in front of the bird. I agree you need to open up the face and eye of the bird. There are many ways to do this. Here I just used a soft Dodge tool set to Midtones and clicked a few times over the face and eye. You could also use a quickmask to select the face and then make adjustments to the selection like Levels or Curves.

  9. #9
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Chardine View Post
    I love the water Cody- very "dreamy" in the BG and nice, well-defined ripples in front of the bird. I agree you need to open up the face and eye of the bird. There are many ways to do this. Here I just used a soft Dodge tool set to Midtones and clicked a few times over the face and eye. You could also use a quickmask to select the face and then make adjustments to the selection like Levels or Curves.
    Wow that is 100 times better

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Cody. And you can be assured that the technique I used is the digital equivalent of what you would do in the darkroom- dodging (lightening/decreasing exposure of photographic paper under the enlarger) and burning (darkening/increasing exposure).
    Try the technique yourself. I want to make sure you know how to do it.

  11. #11
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Chardine View Post
    Thanks Cody. And you can be assured that the technique I used is the digital equivalent of what you would do in the darkroom- dodging (lightening/decreasing exposure of photographic paper under the enlarger) and burning (darkening/increasing exposure).
    Try the technique yourself. I want to make sure you know how to do it.
    I will be sure to as soon as I get home from work! We are busy implementing a new VOIP system at work so they would probably frown upon image editting here haha

  12. #12
    Cody Covey
    Guest

    Default



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well done!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics