Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: 50D or 7D?

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida, USA
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    8
    Thank You Posts

    Default 50D or 7D?

    Although I'm not going to be making any major purchases in the immediate future, I am in a position to save up some money for a new body. I'm currently using a 40D + Sigma 4.0/5.6 120-400mm mainly for wildlife, BIF, etc. While I'm quite content with the 40D, I'm looking to upgrade for better low-light handling (ie. less noise at higher ISO etc.).

    I've searched for suggestions/comparisons on the internet, but everything became a blur very quickly. So I figured there was no better place to come for advice than the talented people at BPN.

    All suggestions and comments are more than welcome.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida, USA
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    8
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I should add that the two bodies that seem to make the most sense to me at the moment are the 50D and 7D. Are there any others I should be considering/researching?

  3. #3
    Flavio Rose
    Guest

    Default

    Couple recommendations (I own a 7D):

    Make sure you buy refurbished or used, not new, if you buy the 50D or 7D. They are late in their cycle. The 7D has dropped in price a lot over the past year (original price $1699 new, last I saw $1349 refurbished). Many used copies of the 7D are on sale.

    Consider deferring any DSLR purchase until Canon catches up (if it can) with the low noise of the latest crop sensors from the other DSLR makers (e.g., Nikon D7000).

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida, USA
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    8
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flavio Rose View Post
    Couple recommendations (I own a 7D):

    Make sure you buy refurbished or used, not new, if you buy the 50D or 7D. They are late in their cycle. The 7D has dropped in price a lot over the past year (original price $1699 new, last I saw $1349 refurbished). Many used copies of the 7D are on sale.

    Consider deferring any DSLR purchase until Canon catches up (if it can) with the low noise of the latest crop sensors from the other DSLR makers (e.g., Nikon D7000).
    I was definitely going to go with a used or refurbished model. Are you overall happy with your 7D?

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    364
    Threads
    18
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Is there a reason you would not step up to a 1.3x crop body as your "next camera"?

  6. #6
    Flavio Rose
    Guest

    Default

    For me the 7D works well. Pixel density is nice, back LCD is nice, Live View autofocus is sometimes useful. Static AF is good. I don't do enough BIF to judge the AI Servo AF which has been the 7D's most controversial feature.

    As for 1.3x crop bodies, the following is my thinking for what it's worth. You can get a used 500 f/4 for little more than the price of a 1D4, and the glass is a better investment. Used 1D2's are tempting because of low cost but their pixel density is very low. Used 1D3's would be a gamble because of the AF issues, and they too have quite low pixel density.
    Last edited by Flavio Rose; 02-25-2011 at 11:51 PM.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    364
    Threads
    18
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well the OP was about lower noise at high ISO, and while I can appreciate the economic sense of going for a 1.6 crop body, the 1.3x crop bodies will invariably have better noise performance from within the same product release cycle.

  8. #8
    Flavio Rose
    Guest

    Default

    OK, Chris, you are compelling me to make extremely controversial statements.

    I have shot a lot of birds with a 400 mm lens. When you shoot birds with a 400 mm lens, you crop a lot.

    If most shots get cropped, then having a bigger sensor -- as in a 1.3x crop camera instead of a 1.6x -- just means you will crop even more heavily. Noise is roughly inverse to the area of the sensor (mm2 of sensor) that is taken up by your subject, i.e., to the light the sensor gathers for your subject. (You could say this only holds within the same product release cycle, but really I think it holds for all product release cycles since 2006 or so when progress in noise stopped for Canon.) If most shots are at maximum zoom and still get cropped, the only way to make that area taken up by the subject bigger is longer glass. You can't make that area bigger just by having a bigger sensor unless you have the glass to make the bird fill it.

    Now, for nonbird subjects, the result is very different. Suppose you are shooting at 200 mm focal length and your subject fills the frame. Under that assumption, exchanging a 40D for a 1D3 -- which forces you to zoom to 260 mm to keep the subject filling the much larger frame -- will result in considerably lower noise because the area of the sensor covered by the subject (i.e., the whole sensor) is considerably bigger.

    All this is first order rough calculation.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida, USA
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    8
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I understand the 1.3 crop sensor would be better on noise, but the fact that I usually shoot at my max zoom of 400 and still crop as Flavio does makes me want to rule out the 1.3 crop and full frame for the time being (at least until I have the means to make an investment in a bigger lens).

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I've owned both the 50D and the 7D. The 7D has much better high ISO performance than the 50D in spite of the higher pixel count. It has exceptional AF and a great feature set. If you're ruling out a 1.3 crop sensor, the 7D is a no brainer.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Rigaud Mountain,Quebec
    Posts
    94
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have a 50D,very noisey camera,Now have a D7000 amazing camera,if only my canon 400-5.6 would fit the nikon ide be happy

  12. #12
    Flavio Rose
    Guest

    Default

    You might want to look at this page to see how much progress Canon has made in high ISO from 40D to 50D to 7D.

    http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Camera-Sensor/Compare/Compare-sensors/%28appareil1%29/619|0/%28appareil2%29/272|0/%28appareil3%29/180|0/%28onglet%29/0/%28brand%29/Canon/%28brand2%29/Canon/%28brand3%29/Canon

    Press the button marked "18% SNR" and you get a comparative graph for the three cameras.

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida, USA
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    8
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all so very much for all your advice - I'm definitely leaning more towards the 7D.

  14. #14
    BPN Member Julie Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,236
    Threads
    122
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jen,

    I own the 5D MKII and can tell you that it is a super performer at high ISOs. There have been a few threads on this subject and you might be interested in what Arash and Roger Clark have to say.

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...azeghi+5D+MKII
    My photoblog: juliebrown.aminus3.com

    My galleries: julielbrown.smugmug.com

    My WordPress blog: indybirdphotographer.com


    "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks”.

    John Muir

  15. #15
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Smithville,Tx
    Posts
    400
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I went from a 40D to a 7D and love it. The 50D wouldn't seem to be enough of a difference from the 40D to bother with.

  16. #16
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Until I make the jump to a pro-body - the 1D4 or the future 1D4s/1D??/ I might just go for the full frame for landscape work - my two camera combo which works great for me is the 5D2 and the 7D. Both great cameras!!
    Cheers, Jay

    My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com

    "Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics