Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Chestnut-capped Brush-finch

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Rancho Santa Fe, CA
    Posts
    133
    Threads
    41
    Thank You Posts

    Default Chestnut-capped Brush-finch

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    The biggest challenge with this shot was the low light, but flash fill saved the day. The tip of the tail was outside the frame, so I borrowed a tail tip along with a bit of real estate from another shot in the sequence. Photographed at Bosque del Paz on recent workshop with Doug Brown and Greg Basco.

    EOS 7D, 300mm f2.8 + 2X, ISO 1250, 1/200", f/5.6, fill flash

    Comments welcomed and encouraged.

    Bill
    Last edited by Doug Brown; 02-25-2011 at 11:53 AM. Reason: Corrected bird ID and EXIF data

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good work on the tail Bill, and I like the various colours on the finch. Good to see how the finch's chest follows the curvature of the rock infront of him, and do wish he had turned his head a touch towards you.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    One of my sleeper favorite birds from the trip Bill. The low light was a definite challenge, but you handled it well. Just the right amount of fill flash (remember to include that in your EXIF data). A slight head turn towards the viewer would have been nice. I would consider some additional sharpening of the bird, and I'd remove the light green vegetation above the tail feathers.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    966
    Threads
    41
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi, Bill. I agree with Doug. This isn't one of the flashiest birds we have but it's really a beautiful little species, so I'm glad you were able to capture a nice image of him. Balance of flash and ambient light for the BG is right on so big congrats there. Too bad about the head turn but what can you do?

    Doug, I don't know about the light moss by the tail. I walked a long way for that rock with the moss and then carried it for 15 minutes (literally) to get it to our setup area. It was heavy, and I would hate to have my effort cloned out in a few seconds

    Cheers,
    Greg

  5. #5
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    lovely bird and great-looking techs here Bill!

    I agree with sharpening the bird some more...

    How do you find the 7D performing with a 300 2.8 and 2x? did you use the new 2x?
    I am looking at investing in one of the last of the old generation lenses :)
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  6. #6
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very cool little bird! Love the plumage - looks like you've done it justice. Minimal habitat, but still has lush feel. I agree about HA, and I agree with Doug about the tiny bits of green peeking above the tail feathers. There is also a hint of steel-eye on the lower part of the pupil that could go.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Rancho Santa Fe, CA
    Posts
    133
    Threads
    41
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Quote Originally Posted by Morkel Erasmus View Post
    lovely bird and great-looking techs here Bill!

    I agree with sharpening the bird some more...

    How do you find the 7D performing with a 300 2.8 and 2x? did you use the new 2x?
    I am looking at investing in one of the last of the old generation lenses :)
    Morkel,

    Since the 7D, 300 2.8 & old style 2X is the only far-reaching setup I own, I have nothing to compare/contrast it with. My only other alternative is to use the 1.4X instead of the 2X, thus less glass but also less pixels on the bird and surely lower image quality. I do not own the new 2X. I think the weakest element in my "far-reaching" setup is the 7D, itself, as the image quality suffers in low light. I have ordered a 1D Mark IV to address that problem. I'm reluctant to get a longer primary lens, as I'm not sure I am strong enough to carry it.

    Thanks to all who commented on this image. This repost removes the moss above the tail, has a somewhat sharpened bird, somewhat cleaned up rock work on left side of image and a bit more NR on the BKGRD. Daniel, I have removed the "steel-eye" from the bottom of the pupil, although that is a new term to me and I don't know what causes it. Doug, thanks for correcting the name of the bird.

    Bill

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics