Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Vantage point

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default Vantage point

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Keeping our Cheetah theme going..............

    This is one of the 11 month old bros pair, who bounded up this tree for a higher vantage point to survey a small group of thompson's gazelle looking for baby snacks.
    A storm was approaching and they used this opportunity with success around 30 mins later.
    A pity I didn't heed the same with a poor selection of slow SS.
    Undecided on the crop here, could work with the landscape taken out too, interested on your thoughts. ( I'll post that alternate in a moment)

    D700 70-200VRII 1/30s f/8 ISO800@200mm Masai Mara, Kenya Oct 2010. approx 20% taken off top & RHS

    C & C most welcome.

    Cheers
    Marc
    Last edited by Marc Mol; 02-15-2011 at 01:32 AM.


  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    The alternate pano crop version here:
    Last edited by Marc Mol; 02-15-2011 at 01:58 AM.


  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I am going with OP here, love the pose , tail , tree and never ending African plains , excellent
    TFS

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Marc, I'm with Harshad, prefer OP.

    I can only wonder and can't help think, wish this had been shot wider, illustrating/incorporating more of the habitat too, but still having the tree, cat to the rhs, but offering a bigger picture to the scene. As if the Cheetah was scouting, on the lookout for it's next meal?

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Marc, I'm with Harshad, prefer OP.

    I can only wonder and can't help think, wish this had been shot wider, illustrating/incorporating more of the habitat too, but still having the tree, cat to the rhs, but offering a bigger picture to the scene. As if the Cheetah was scouting, on the lookout for it's next meal?

    TFS
    Steve
    Can't argue with that Steve, as you may know action like this happens pretty quickly,
    after this image I went for the wider shot (out to 70mm) but it had moved, scrambling down that tree and my SS was even worse, resulting in blah !!


  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very true Marc, one has to seize the moment,I was thinking of a nice 24mm (Hilary POV) I bet you enjoyed the moment though.

    BTW Didn't think the Nikon did 'blah' :2

    cheers
    steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  7. #7
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Marc,

    I like the OP best for the reasons stated by Harshad, you can even see what he should be looking at.

    The Cheetah looks remarkably yellow, moving towards orange on my monitor.

    Cheetahs often climb trees to look for prey, they must be better than termite mounds?

  8. #8
    Todd Frost
    Guest

    Default

    Nice view of the cheetah in search mode Marc. I too prefer the op for reasons mentioned above as well as a grounding effect for the cat. Agree with Ken re: colors, the cheetah looks over saturated/off on my monitors as well.
    Steve, nikon does "blah" we just normally spell it different... sh**, but then it's normally user error

    TFS
    Todd

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Merseyside, UK
    Posts
    857
    Threads
    132
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Original Post for me as well Marc.

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but nature moves and we have to go with our best guess or first choice at times.

    Cheers

    Austin

  10. #10
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    OP for me too...great behaviour here Marc.

    Cheetah does look a tad too saturated IMHO, and like Steve I would've liked the even wider perspective...with a little more of the gazelles showing in the BG

    I think the SS caused you to lose crispness on the cheetah's face :(
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Watkins View Post
    Marc,

    I like the OP best for the reasons stated by Harshad, you can even see what he should be looking at.

    The Cheetah looks remarkably yellow, moving towards orange on my monitor.

    Cheetahs often climb trees to look for prey, they must be better than termite mounds?
    Re. colour, he does look too saturated? Not sure what has happened here as I used sat level of +10 which is about my norm?? The darker skies intensifying the colour perhaps?
    Just realized I used a lumo mask on this also, should have selectively left his colour out.
    Last edited by Marc Mol; 02-15-2011 at 03:59 PM.


  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Appreciate the comments everyone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Morkel Erasmus View Post

    I would've liked the even wider perspective...with a little more of the gazelles showing in the BG
    Yes, me too Morkel, however with only 2 bodies, one with the 500VR and the other a 70-200VR, my 14-24 often has to take second fiddle when the action happens quickly .
    Three bodies would be ideal of course, but I got stung for excess baggage @ Wilson/Nairobi as it is.:eek:
    Last edited by Marc Mol; 02-15-2011 at 04:01 PM.


  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I've looked at this image over and over again but wasn't sure if I could add anything to the other comments. I feel your pain at not have the perfect camera settings that you would have wanted, but it could be worse … i.e. you could be me, never seeing a cheetah in a tree at all!!!

    Personally, I think you may have over worked the cat, and I vote for the OP.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics