Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Spring Blackie

  1. #1
    Todd Frost
    Guest

    Default Spring Blackie

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    From Yellowstone a couple springs ago.
    D300, 80-400vr @400, 1/200, f5.6, iso720 +2/3 EC
    Thanks for looking, comments and critiques appreciated.
    Todd

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,797
    Threads
    708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Like the low perspective here Todd, with good detail in the face. Would have liked some seperation from the brush on LHS.
    TFS


  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    To add Marc's comment , may be worth trying 1/3rd underexposure , VD
    TFS

  4. #4
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Todd,

    I think just a tad of opening up the blacks may help, bush is a bit of a nuisance but not much.

    Great pose

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Todd, it is a magnificent bear but I do find the bush a bit off putting. I think if the bear had turned his head to look through the gap, rather than looking where he is going, the bush would have been less of a hindrance. I don't mind the oof grasses at the front, strangely enough.

  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Todd, exposure looks good and I like the composition. Good detail where you need it, especially in the face. `Might be tempted to run some NR on the BG just to help things.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg - South Africa
    Posts
    2,114
    Threads
    190
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the low angle, left bush distracts a little pity but overall still like the shot TFS

  8. #8
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Todd,

    Good looking bear. Brush mentioned.

    From a compositional perspective, I prefer not the have to look through OOF FG obstructions to get to the center of interest. As a wildlife photographer I understand this is particularly difficult given that many animals are secretive and want to stay out of sight so sometimes getting an image of one is difficult and you make the best of the situation.

    I guess as a bird photographer and especially in Florida, getting opportunities at subjects in the open makes us a bit spoiled.

    So we go out to photograph the animals we love always trying to present them at their best. Thanks for posting and hope I am not being to philosophical this morning.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,032
    Threads
    64
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I must agree with the POV. Lovely. IQ perfect and well exposed.

  10. #10
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like that the face is at least in the clear, wish for less FG vegetation, but nicely done here Todd.

    Robert - yeah but you know in Africa even being a bird-photographer can be frustrating with all our thick foliage :)
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  11. #11
    Todd Frost
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks for the comments everyone. The brush is what it is, it's where he/she was and you don't get much chance at positioning these guys or yourself for that matter in YNP (to many rangers around bear jams, for our safety of course). Of course it would be nicer more in the open and I do have many bear images like that.
    No problems Robert, not over philosophical as far as I'm concerned. I agree with your comment about Floridonians being a bit spoiled with the open areas as well as the number and close proximity to subjects and available light. Sometimes I think y'all should take a trip to the Puget Sound area (away from the beaches) and see what frustration is. Not that you don't have your own set of issues to deal with
    Thanks again everyone.
    Todd

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    364
    Threads
    18
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I may be tempted to do some selective burning in of the foliage and OOF BG. Composition wise--Good.

  13. #13
    Todd Frost
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks for the comment and suggestion Chris, will have a look.

    Todd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics