Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Loggerhead Shrike

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default Loggerhead Shrike

    Hello everyone, well this is my first time posting here. I finally got the courage to post here so here it goes. I finally got the chance to get close enough to capture some decent pics of this amazing bird. Shot from my car window. I removed some branches to the left of it, sharpened it, and ran surface blur on the bacground.
    Camera - Nikon 300s, Lense - Nikon 200-400mm f4 w/1.4 tc, Exposure - 1/1250, Aperture - f10, ISO - 800, Focal Length - 550, Aperture Priority.

    Robert,
    Please repost your image. We only allow an image to be 800px on the vertical and 1024px on the horizontal.
    Your image was 1024 on the vert.
    Thanks and welcome to BPN.
    Last edited by James Shadle; 02-09-2011 at 09:54 AM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ok. I hope this one works.


  3. #3
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Thank You!!!

    Robert,
    Before I offer a critique, how much of a crop is this image?
    James

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Shadle View Post
    Thank You!!!

    Robert,
    Before I offer a critique, how much of a crop is this image?
    James
    Hello James. I did not how to figure this out but somebody gave some kind of formula. I multiply the w&h of the original, multiply the w&h of the cropped pic, then divided the sums. So if did my math correct and the formula is right I come out with 11%.

  5. #5
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    11% crop or 11% of the original :)

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Peters View Post
    11% crop or 11% of the original :)
    Hello Lance. I'm going to be honest, I really don't know. I have never been asked how much of a crop or been able to figure it out. All I can say is that looking at the original and how much I cropped its a little over half a crop. Looking at this image posted here I see that it looks to be on the soft side. When I resized it for this forum I totally forgot to re-sharpen the image. I don't know if that has something to do with it..

    On another note and this is not to make any excuses for me. I have just been photographing for a little over 6 months. I knew nothing about photography, so everything I know has been
    self taught and what I've learned reading trough forums. So I apologize if I seem dumb and not know certain things you ask me, but I am eager to learn.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Robert; no need to apologize! The reason degree of cropping is important is because the more you crop any image the more the image degrades, and this image quality problem can easily be attributed to other reasons if the crop influence has not been disclosed.
    Do you shoot RAW, and what image editor do you use? If you use ACR (adobe camera raw) you can note the size of the un-cropped image, shown at the bottom center in MP (megapixels) , and the size that shows up after you crop. You will come up with something like 12.4 MP cropped to 8MP, which to me is more useful (and unambiguous) than percentage. In the example roughly 1/3 has been cropped.
    About your image; nice shrike image with the classic thorny plant they like. Image detail could certainly be better. The techs seem appropriate, though F/10 is probably overkill unless you were very close.
    regards~Bill

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WIlliam Maroldo View Post
    Robert; no need to apologize! The reason degree of cropping is important is because the more you crop any image the more the image degrades, and this image quality problem can easily be attributed to other reasons if the crop influence has not been disclosed.
    Do you shoot RAW, and what image editor do you use? If you use ACR (adobe camera raw) you can note the size of the un-cropped image, shown at the bottom center in MP (megapixels) , and the size that shows up after you crop. You will come up with something like 12.4 MP cropped to 8MP, which to me is more useful (and unambiguous) than percentage. In the example roughly 1/3 has been cropped.
    About your image; nice shrike image with the classic thorny plant they like. Image detail could certainly be better. The techs seem appropriate, though F/10 is probably overkill unless you were very close.
    regards~Bill
    Hello Bill. Thank you very much for your feedback. As to shooting in RAW. I don't. I shoot jpeg. I know its highly recommend to shoot RAW. I have tried in the past to shoot Raw and used the NIKON software that came with my 300s to process it. When I load the pic I really don't know what adjustments I need to make so I rather not deal with it. Do you recommend any books or websites that I can read to help me out.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Robert. Hopefully someone else here can point you on info on working with RAW. There is alot of stuff out there on the subject, but basically it is actually quite simple. Shoot in RAW, open in the RAW converter (with photoshop it is ACR), adjust parameters such as exposure, then open in the image editor.

    What image editor are you using, or plan to use ? regards~Bill

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WIlliam Maroldo View Post
    Hi Robert. Hopefully someone else here can point you on info on working with RAW. There is alot of stuff out there on the subject, but basically it is actually quite simple. Shoot in RAW, open in the RAW converter (with photoshop it is ACR), adjust parameters such as exposure, then open in the image editor.

    What image editor are you using, or plan to use ? regards~Bill
    I use PhotoShop cs4

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    CS4, good. Shoot images in RAW, place in a separate folder on your computer, open this in Adobe Bridge, double click on the thumbnail of the image and it will open in ACR, after adjusting click "open image" and you are in CS4.
    You can also shoot RAW + jpeg and use the jpeg image as a guide to ACR adjustments to get a feel for the workflow. regards~Bill

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WIlliam Maroldo View Post
    CS4, good. Shoot images in RAW, place in a separate folder on your computer, open this in Adobe Bridge, double click on the thumbnail of the image and it will open in ACR, after adjusting click "open image" and you are in CS4.
    You can also shoot RAW + jpeg and use the jpeg image as a guide to ACR adjustments to get a feel for the workflow. regards~Bill
    Bill thank you very much for all the advice.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hey Robert and welcome. This is a great way to start your posting. This is one of those birds I have never seen. Your composition with the long vertical frame and the long stretch of branch before you reach the bird is unusual and I like it very much. You got a nice catchlight in the shrike's eye and I like the 'look back over the shoulder' pose.

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    El Paso, TX USA
    Posts
    3,456
    Threads
    162
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Cassell View Post
    Hey Robert and welcome. This is a great way to start your posting. This is one of those birds I have never seen. Your composition with the long vertical frame and the long stretch of branch before you reach the bird is unusual and I like it very much. You got a nice catchlight in the shrike's eye and I like the 'look back over the shoulder' pose.
    Thank you very much for your feedback.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics