Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Short-eared Owl

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default Short-eared Owl

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another day and a bit better luck.
    Although when i went out to the site I, in my new insulated $40 rubbers, I went on the water side of the dyke into the marsh lands. I hunkered down and waited patiently for the hawks and owls to show.

    Meanwhile a dozen or so big lenses were lined up on the dyke looking the other way.

    All the action was there. Eventually I did leave my hiding spot and spent the last 20 minutes of so of good light with a couple owls and hawks.

    7D, 500mm + 1.4 TE, 1/1250, f/7.1. I was surprised by how much sharper images appeared in field by st0pping down lens just a bit when using TC.

    The owl was flying quite fast and was on the right side of frame. I added canvas and filled it with a cut from the left side and then cropped.

    The left side of face was in shadow and has been lightened quite a bit as has the upper wing.

    Dave

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Toasty south Florida
    Posts
    46
    Threads
    7
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That's an unusual image, and I can appreciate the difficulty in the position in the frame. I usually crop a flight shot (balance is my pet peeve). Love the intensity in the eye and the wing positions. And what a perfect background for this bird. Nice!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful warm light and of course I love the "look" Dave. As Gloria mentioned, BG and habitat work really well. The only thing about this image (which I didn't see in the previous one) is that the eyes give away a bit of motion blur, so this one does not look at crisp as the last one.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    White Rock, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,047
    Threads
    262
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dave, you've been getting a lot of SEO images and each is getting better. I like the one wing down and agree with John re: eyes.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default Repost

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    As soon as I posted the original I thought it was not sharp enough so went back and tightened things up a bit more.

    I also thought there may have been a few tell tales where some cloning took place so fixed those up as well.

    Let's try this one. I am curious to see if the repost is better/satisfactory.

    Thanks

    Dave

  6. #6
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    I think the repost is much stronger. I only see really bad noise in the underwing area so I'd consider either running NR there or letting the deep shadow come back in to hide the noise. Those eyes are beautiful and you did a good job of crisping them up!

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Jules.

    I probably needed to do a little bit of compromising under that wing.

    Now that i have looked a photo a few more times I also think focus was more on the down wing than head, which might make some sense for the camera focus system.

    Dave

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics